This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMUX136: Application and Cascade capability

Part Number: TMUX136
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX131, , DS280MB810

Hi All, 

I have some questions relating to application of these ICs,

Q1: Can this device be used with the following protocols: USB 2.0/3.0, ethernet, HDMI and RS232?

Q2: Can this device be cascaded with other TMUX131 devices,

Q3 I didn't see an insertion loss figure in the datasheet, so is there a way to calculate the max number of these device if they can be cascaded? 

Thank you very much for your help 

Kind regards 

Wes

  • Question 2 should say TMUX136 not TMUX131 my apologies.

  • also, one more question, would ac coupling capacitors be needed for any of the highspeed signals mentioned above? 

  • Hi Wes,

    The key careabout when deciding if a device can support a given protocol is supply voltage and bandwidth. That being said, it appears the TMUX136 can support al of these given the 6GHz bandwidth of the device. 

    You can indeed cascade these devices as well! Fortunately, the team has recently released an app note on this exact topic. This app note covers the impact of cascading on insertion loss as well! You can expect your insertion loss to roughly double when cascading 2 muxes and an increase in loss from there - although not linear. 

     Unfortunately, we do not spec insertion loss directly in our datasheet. At lower frequencies, the insertion loss will almost be directly related to the on-resistance of the switch. While as you go up in frequency, any parasitic capacitances can be more influential as well.

    Below is the frequency performance curve of the TMUX136. As you can see, the insertion loss will typically be around 1dB at 3GHz and 3dB at 6Ghz (nominally).

    For ac coupling caps, this device is a passive FET switch and may be properly operated with or without external components as long as the datasheet specifications are satisfied.  You may put a AC coupling capacitor on the signal path without issue as long as there is a DC bias somewhere on the other side of the switch keeping the signal above 0V.

    I hope this helps!

    Let me know if anything else is needed here. 

    Regards,

    Alex

  • Hi Alex,

    First of all thank you so much for this detailed answer and the application notes, this has helped greatly and also confirmed some of my simulation practices :). 

    The only, other question I have regarding this device is (please forgive me if I have overlooked this in the data sheet) the maximum port A to COM1/PORT B to COM2 voltage, I think if I have read correctly, the TMUX136 can handle 5V signals? Slight smile

    Kind regards

    Wes

  • Some other questions that comes to mind, is there an IC available from TI, that can assess the quality of differential/LVDS/Protocols mentioned signals, that can be used in conjunction with the TMUX 136, also would the DS280MB810ZBLR be a suitable protocol agnostic signal conditioning IC?

    Again many thanks for your advice :)

  • Hi Wes,

    Technically, yes, the TMUX136 can handle 5V I/O signals, but this falls under the absolute maximum ratings for the device. Exposure to absolute maximum rated conditions for extended periods may affect device reliability.

    The recommended operating conditions state a max of 3.6V should be going through the switch.

    Regarding DS280MB810ZBLR, this is an HSSC part so I'll move this thread to them in order to chime in on this inquiry. 

    Regards,

    Alex

  • Hi there, I have another question, in the application note, I notice the TMUX136 is mentioned as a low R(on) part and suitable for large cascades, the stated R(on) in the app note is 2 Ohms, but the datasheet appears to differ and mentions 5.7ohms for R(on), can some clarification be provided here please? :)

  • Hi Wes,

    While the DS280MB810 does not have a protocol dependency, it acts as a linear redriver. Depending on the signaling level, it may not be suitable as a general purpose MUX.

    For example, I would expect the DS280MB810 to work for several different Ethernet applications, but I believe RS232 has a high signaling level that may not be suitable for DS280MB810.

    Thanks,

    Drew

  • Hi Drew,

    Thank you, in my application, I am not intending to condition RS232 signals, only LVDS and highspeed signals :). RS232 is a separate part of my primary application, with this in mind, would the DS280MB810 be suitable for HDMI/Ethernet/USB2.0/3.0 etc? :).

    Thank you 

    Kind regards 

    Wes

  • Hi Wes,

    Can you share a bit more information about your use case for the DS280MB810?  Would it be to compensate for channel insertion loss, or for it's MUX capabilities?  Please keep in mind that the CTLE boost it provides is on a curve, so a setting providing 10 dB of boost for 25 GbE will provide significantly less boost for 480 Mbps USB2.

    Thanks,

    Drew

  • Hi Wes,

    The 2 Ohms indicated in the app note appears to be a typo. We'll get that fixed! For clarification, the typical Ron is as indicated in the device datasheet - 5.7 Ohms. Sorry for any confusion here!

    Regards,

    Alex

  • Hi Drew,

    Yes certainly, I intend to use the the DS280MB810 as part of a PCB backplane, to compensate for insertion loss and signal integrity issues :).

  • Thank you for the clarification :).

  • Hi Wes,

    Let me check in with my teammates on the compatibility of DS280MB810 across the protocols you mentioned.  I'll have more details to share later this week.

    Thanks,

    Drew

  • Hi Wes,

    I discussed the compatibility of DS280MB810 across various protocols with a teammate, and they highlighted that they had discussed a similar topic with you.

    In general, I think the challenge is that different protocols have different physical level requirements, such as different AC/DC coupling requirements, or half duplex vs simplex communication. Additionally, Base-T ethernet has different electrical signaling than 10G/25G ethernet.

    https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface-group/interface/f/interface-forum/1324357/tusb501-general-enquiries

    To specifically address your question, the DS280MB810 would be a good fit for 10G/25G ethernet, but I would not recommend it for USB/HDMI applications.

    Thanks,

    Drew

  • Hi Drew,

    Thank you very much for your answer, I believe I now have all the information I need to continue my design :). 

    Also, thank you everyone else for your help. 

    Kind regards 

    Wes