This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: TMUX1208
Now I have a question about TMUX1208. I confirm that the signal of our master voltage is from 1.8V to 0V. When I connect to TUMX1208 "S" input, I find the signal's voltage can't low to 0V. It's voltage may be 0.6V.
I don't know why it happened.
Is there any wrong with the application? Thanks a lot!
The most likely reason is that there is a pull-up resistor somewhere on the line. (The schematic is incomplete.)
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Clemens Ladisch:
Hi Clemens Ladisch,
I just only connect TMUX1208 now but it seems the same problem.(Delete R487)
When I cut R170 and I measure R170.1 the signal is good. But when I recovery R170 this issue has happened.
I check there is no pull-up resistor in my line.
In reply to Max CHANNG:
Is there a pull-up resistor configured on pin T10?
Hi Clemens Ladisch,
T10 is our SOC pin. I confirm there is a pull-down in SOC internal.
Max,Is master voltage feeding into S1 in these? Have you tried probing S1 without the master connected? Is the problem only occurring when the signal is sent or is there always 0.6V on that line?Do you also see this voltage on all lines or is there only 0.6V present where there should be 0V on the master clock line that you're using. If I understood your exchange with Clemens, the problem was resolve when you removed the R170 the problem is resolved. Is there a reason for wanting to keep the resistor? What current is being driven here?Rami
In reply to Rami Mooti1:
R170 looks like a 0 Ω link and connects the switch to the SoC, so it's kind of important.
The problem appears to be caused by the SoC. Apparently, the pull-down is actually a pull-up.
it seems I was a bit presumptuous and thought by removing the resistor, he also shorted it and the problem was resolved.
My feelings are the same as clemens here. It does appear that there's a pull-up rather than a pulldown internally here so you arent grounding the signal on low. Have you double checked the soc intenal architecture?
Hi Clemens, hi Rami,
Thanks for your Reply.
I will double-check the SOC internal architecture. If I have something results I will tell you.
I measure our system board 5pcs. I just find only 1 pcs has this issue.
When I let SW update the SOC code. I find this issue has not happened.
Thank you for the directions.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.