This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TIDA-01021: Several errors in design files - BOM, Assembly drawing, Pick and place file. Urgent update needed!

Part Number: TIDA-01021

Hi TI!

We have downloaded all the design files for TIDA-01021 in the present revision and ordered complete manufacturing (PCB and assembly) at an EMS supplier in Germany. The supplier is ready to start assembly and in their final review process they have discovered several inconsistencies in the BOM and assembly drawing. We did a double-check this morning of schematic, assembly drawing, BOM and pick'n place file and could indeed confirm that there are errors that threaten safe operation and functionality of the board if assembled according to present documents.

Example:

R111 (0R) occurs once in the schematic close to OSCinM1 connector and is set to Not Mount. In the layout, R111 occurs twice: The correct position and in the place where R178 ought to be according to schematic, the line connecting U5 pin 13 with U2 pin 8. This means that U5 will see the wrong load because R212 is 100R and R178, instead of 100R, has become 0R.

According to layout, the voltage programming resistors for U12 are called R179, R180, R181, R178, R295 and R296. In the schematic three of these have been removed: R181, R178 and R296. Apparently R178 have been re-used at another position in the schematic without correct backannotation of the layout. The BOM states that R178 shall be 100R, the pick'n place file states that R178 shall be 0R and in either case it being assembled will program U12 to another output voltage than what the schematic values say it should be.

There are more errors than these and we are in a problematic situation here:

* Our supplier cannot go ahead to assembly because of errors in the pick'n place file, the BOM and the assembly drawing. Since the BOM and pick'n place file does not correspond, they have not been able to secure the right amount of components.

* We do not have the resources and the time to manually go through and to our best knowledge try to correct your documents and send to the manufacturer.

* We would not want our supplier to go ahead and do their best according to present documents, since that would cause obvious wrongly placed components and would cause us to have to both manually correct the documents as above and also to manually correct the PCBs by swapping components by hand soldering.

Please TI, do your best to urgently put somebody on correcting the documents from the starting point that the PCBs have been manufactured according to the gerber files and cannot be changed. Thus the reference designators on the board layout have to be governing. We are standing here unable to move forward and valuable project time and money is ticking away.

  • TIDA-01021_Clocking_Board_Engineering_Change_note_2017_1219.docxHi Mats,

    It seems there is an issue of mismatch between the latest schematic and layout. Gerber and CAD files are not updated with the latest schematic and BOM. If you have fabricate the boards as per the downloaded gerber, you can do the modifications as per the attached ECN and performance will be the same as mentioned in the TIDA-01021 design guide.

    We will update the latest design files on TI.com so there won’t be any issue further.

    Thanks!

    Regards,

    Ajeet Pal

  • Hi Ajeet!

    The first TIDA-01021 board is now modified according to your change note and powered up. I have put jumpers on J8 to power up Y1 and on J23 to connect VREGIN to VDDD33. At first the computer (Win 7 Pro) did not manage to self-install USB drivers, so I downloaded the driver executable "CDM21228_Setup.zip" from the FTDI website and ran the installation. I was not certain if the drivers should be D2XX or VCP type, but it seemed like the driver package would cover both. Now, the computer recognizes there's a USB device and it appears in the device manager as a COM4 port.

    The HSDC GUI however does not discover the device. It reports "Device Communication Error: FT_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND" and only lets me continue in simulation mode.

    As I study the FT232H datasheet, and considering there's an EEPROM on the board connected to it, I wonder if it is necessary to first run a separate preconfiguration of the FT232H to get it act as an SPI controller? Or is it something that is already implemented but hidden within the HSDC GUI?

    Please advise. If there's a pre-configuration that must be run first, can you provide it? Was I right on the driver installation, or do you have a designated TI driver for this board?

    Best regards,

    Mats Alexanderson

  • Hi Mats,

    EEPROM of FT232H device need to be update for the TIDA-01021 clocking board with "TIDA1021_28" using the FT_Prog utility.
    Download the FT_Prog utility:  http://www.ftdichip.com/Support/Utilities.htm#FT_PROG

    Once FTDI port string descriptor updated, HSDC TID GUI will identify the board.

    Regards,
    Ajeet Pal

  • Hi Ajeet,

    can you be more specific on what parameters I need to program? I ran the FT_Prog utility, scanned for devices and found one. There appeared to be a default configuration outlined, so I right-clicked on the top level in the device tree and selected "program device". Some new hex code appeared in the device output window. However, this produced no change when starting up the HSDC GUI (after TIDA board power toggle) - board still not found. Should I go into lower level programming of some specific settings in the FT_Prog? Please advise.

    Best regards,
    Mats A
  • Hi Mats,

    Please see the attached doc, which shows the programming sequence of the FT232H EEPROM using the FT_Prog utility.

    Regards,

    Ajeet PalTIDA-01021_Clocking Board FTDI Prog.docx