This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
TIDA-00281: Changes required to run 60V-250W motor on this board.
Part Number: TIDA-00281
In TIDA-00281 i have observed that Driver Board Ground(GND_B) is common with the External MSP Launch Pad.
As per my understanding Launch Pad Ground and Driver Ground(GND_B) must be Separated or Isolated by galvanic isolation for safety and reliability.
Why this kept common in this design?
As we know ,when MOSFET switch there will be switching noise in ground and that Noise might go to Lauch Pad and can Reset MCU or can damage it if Spikes have enough high voltage.
(1)Why Ground Kept common in TIDA-00281?
(2)When to have galvanic isolation between Launch Pad and driver Card like opto coupler etc? any Special Considerations?
additionally with this i have one more concern which i am describing below.
Let's say i have used Galvanic isolation between Lauch Pad and Driver card by Opto-coupler. With this configuration how can i manage Voltage and Current sense signals.
at TI, we typically speak about two kinds of galvanic isolation:
Typical 12/48-V automotive systems do not require basic isolation because voltages are not lethal. The requirement for functional isolation varies from region to region. I've been seeing projects with both. The final decision depends on the OEM and system concept on the vehicle level (if we still speak automotive). Nevertheless, the communication interface is often isolated in order to prevent noise coupling to the communication wires.
I have not worked with TIDA-00281 but I am quite sure that the author was able to maintain noise levels on reasonable level which allowed him to avoid the isolation. If you want to implement isolation, TI offers a broad portfolio of isolators you may like:
Just go to for more details. Note that we do not use opto devices but capacitive technology. The problem with traditional optocouplers is that they suffer from unpredictable aging factor. This make it difficult for the automotive use.
Please note that most, if not all, reference designs at ti.com do not demonstrate the final product. It is close but we test only conditions which are described in the design guide. Such a design demonstrates a silicon chip and highlights some of its features.
For this reason, we often use EVMs like ControlBoards or LaunchPads because they are the easiest way how to add inteligence to the system and interface with the demonstrated chip (e.g. gate driver) or subsystem (e.g. motor control)
Regards, Jiri Panacek
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Just to add to what Jiri said, this design uses a Launchpad to allow for changing the microcontroller based on any designer's preferred MCU. Typically the MCU would be on the board, so it would share a ground with either the 12V system or the 48V system. Because there are many more interconnections on the 48V side, it is more cost-effective to put the MCU on the 48V side, and thus only need isolation for the three CAN signals TX and RX and STB.
-- Clark Kinnaird
In reply to Clark Kinnaird:
I am building Motor Driver card for Electric Vehicle.
BLDC Motor is rated at 60V/250W and i have taken reference of TIDA-00281 to build motor driver card.
Do i require any isolation in this system.I have not used CAN interface as i don't need.Also i haven't used flyback section because all the voltages are available with us.
In reply to Abhi Choksi:
In my opinion, the isolation is not required in your application. Output power rating is rather low and for this reason, I don't expect any troubles. Of course, proper PCB layout and engineering techniques (e.g. bypass capacitors) are expected.
In reply to Jiri Panacek85:
In same application do i require to isolate PWM signals from launch pad?
On what basis you decide that this system require isolation or not.
I want to know more in details for this.
it is impossible to answer your question without knowing the end-application in details. Your motor drive is extremely small. Smaller the drive is, more likely it avoids galvanic isolation. As mentioned before, the need for basic isolation comes from regulations which vary with the market/region.
The consideration for the functional isolation starts with the system level, for example:
This is given by the system architects (OEMs) and I am not qualified to give any detailed guidance.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.