This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TIDA-010210: PWM Switching strategy for ANPC inverter

Part Number: TIDA-010210
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F28377D, , AMC3302

Tool/software:

Hi,

I am referring the design guide for 11kW 3 phase ANPC. The application note states that "Optimized control scheme needs only 6 PWMs
versus 9 PWMs for standard implementation".

Question 1: Is this 6PWMs switching strategy done for some reason or the microcontroller is not having sufficient PWM signals? Any advantage of using 4PWM to 6PWM generation using AND and OR logic as shown below.

I am using TMS320F28377D for the ANPC Inverter. The PWM strategy used is as bellow.

PWM Signal Switch Frequency
EPWM1A Q2A Low Frequency
EPWM1B Q3A Low Frequency
EPWM2A Q1A 300kHz
EPWM2B Q5A 300kHz
EPWM3A Q6A 300kHz
EPWM3B Q4A 300kHz
EPWM4A Q2B Low Frequency
EPWM4B Q3B Low Frequency
EPWM5A Q1B 300kHz
EPWM5B Q5B 300kHz
EPWM6A Q6B 300kHz
EPWM6B Q4B 300kHz
EPWM7A Q2C Low Frequency
EPWM7B Q3C Low Frequency
EPWM8A Q1C 300kHz
EPWM8B Q5C 300kHz
EPWM11A Q6C 300kHz
EPWM11B Q4C 300kHz

 Question 2: Is this 18 PWM strategy is okay? Can we program 300KHZ switching frequency for the ePWM?  

I have seen most of the app note for ANPC which uses outer 4 switches as high frequency switching and inner 2 switch as low frequency. 

Question 3: Any advantage we get when we use outer  high frequency switching(Q1, Q5, Q6, Q4 switches at 300kHz)? If we change this to inner high frequency switching(Q2,Q3 = 300kHz) what will be impact in terms of power loss, efficiency. 

Please help with your answer on the questions asked. It will help in understanding ANPC inverter design strategy.

Thanks,

Namita