Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F28377D, , AMC3302
Tool/software:
Hi,
I am referring the design guide for 11kW 3 phase ANPC. The application note states that "Optimized control scheme needs only 6 PWMs
versus 9 PWMs for standard implementation".
Question 1: Is this 6PWMs switching strategy done for some reason or the microcontroller is not having sufficient PWM signals? Any advantage of using 4PWM to 6PWM generation using AND and OR logic as shown below.

I am using TMS320F28377D for the ANPC Inverter. The PWM strategy used is as bellow.
| PWM Signal | Switch | Frequency |
| EPWM1A | Q2A | Low Frequency |
| EPWM1B | Q3A | Low Frequency |
| EPWM2A | Q1A | 300kHz |
| EPWM2B | Q5A | 300kHz |
| EPWM3A | Q6A | 300kHz |
| EPWM3B | Q4A | 300kHz |
| EPWM4A | Q2B | Low Frequency |
| EPWM4B | Q3B | Low Frequency |
| EPWM5A | Q1B | 300kHz |
| EPWM5B | Q5B | 300kHz |
| EPWM6A | Q6B | 300kHz |
| EPWM6B | Q4B | 300kHz |
| EPWM7A | Q2C | Low Frequency |
| EPWM7B | Q3C | Low Frequency |
| EPWM8A | Q1C | 300kHz |
| EPWM8B | Q5C | 300kHz |
| EPWM11A | Q6C | 300kHz |
| EPWM11B | Q4C | 300kHz |

Question 2: Is this 18 PWM strategy is okay? Can we program 300KHZ switching frequency for the ePWM?
I have seen most of the app note for ANPC which uses outer 4 switches as high frequency switching and inner 2 switch as low frequency.
Question 3: Any advantage we get when we use outer high frequency switching(Q1, Q5, Q6, Q4 switches at 300kHz)? If we change this to inner high frequency switching(Q2,Q3 = 300kHz) what will be impact in terms of power loss, efficiency.
Please help with your answer on the questions asked. It will help in understanding ANPC inverter design strategy.
Thanks,
Namita