<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Simulation, hardware &amp;amp; system design tools forum - Recent Threads</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum</link><description>WEBENCH , TINA-TI ,  PSpice  for TI, TI reference designs, hardware system design</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:42:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum" /><item><title>TPS6288X-Q1-DESIGN: Looking for .tsm File for TPS62811</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1685281?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:11:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:37e6bb14-a73b-4c62-a66e-dd1b3461da87</guid><dc:creator>Kira Singleton</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1685281?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1685281/tps6288x-q1-design-looking-for-tsm-file-for-tps62811/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; TPS6288X-Q1-DESIGN&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does anyone have a .tsm file to import into TINA-TI for circuit simulation? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TPS6288X-Q1-DESIGN: Looking for .tsm File for TPS62811</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6508772?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:42:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8a69011d-3b64-4cb4-92d1-41ba39413e89</guid><dc:creator>Farheen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6508772?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1685281/tps6288x-q1-design-looking-for-tsm-file-for-tps62811/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Kira,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing the details! Unfortunately, we can not provide un-encrypted model without NDA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Farheen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TPLD1201-Q1: Rising Edge Retrigger</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1685439?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 05:33:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:aa1c5fc8-271a-4e65-8a3e-88b4b054127d</guid><dc:creator>Mohan Kumar</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1685439?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1685439/tpld1201-q1-rising-edge-retrigger/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; TPLD1201-Q1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I require a rising-edge retriggerable pulse detector with the following functionality:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;When a rising edge is detected on the input pulse, the output should go HIGH and remain HIGH for 800 ms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;If another rising edge is received before the completion of the 800 ms period, the timer should reset and restart the 800 ms timing period from the latest rising edge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;If no new rising edge is received within 800 ms, the output should go LOW.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Could you please review the attached TPLD configuration and confirm whether it is correct and satisfies the above requirements?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/0020.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-53012" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please let me know if any modifications are required.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TPLD1201-Q1: Rising Edge Retrigger</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6508254?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:38:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1fa4e9fd-e3b2-4c40-8302-cf4f105457e3</guid><dc:creator>Nikki Dengel</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6508254?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1685439/tpld1201-q1-rising-edge-retrigger/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mohan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do not recommend your current configuration because when IO1 is not active, you will get a continuous set of pulses on the output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What kind of accuracy do you need?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suggest trying something similar to the below configuration. Keep in mind that the delay will have a two-clock-cycle sync period the first time it is triggered that will not re-occur during re-triggering.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://e2e.ti.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/pastedimage1791837326479v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nikki&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PSPICE-FOR-TI: TPS62902: startup waveform changes when only transient stop time is changed</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688339?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:44:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:965b1fcc-990c-4651-92e8-7e7f96e81ac2</guid><dc:creator>Donghyeon Min</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688339?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688339/pspice-for-ti-tps62902-startup-waveform-changes-when-only-transient-stop-time-is-changed/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; PSPICE-FOR-TI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m seeing different startup results with the TPS62902 transient model in PSpice for TI 23.1.0 (30 January 2024).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the supplied STARTUP circuit, I ran two simulations in fresh PSpice processes, changing only the stop time:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.TRAN 0 1m 0 20n&lt;br /&gt;.TRAN 0 2m 0 20n&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The circuit and model are identical. Both save EN, VOUT and SS/TR, and use ADVCONV, ABSTOL=1n, ITL4=50 and RELTOL=0.002. These are adjusted diagnostic settings, not the default profile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both runs complete without errors. However, near 900 us, VOUT is about 0.508 V with the 1 ms stop time and 0.000603 V with the 2 ms stop time. In the 2 ms run, VOUT rises to about 0.297 V around 776 us, then falls toward zero. An earlier 2 ms run produced the same waveform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a recommended solver setting or model update for this? I&amp;#39;d like to understand why changing the stop time changes the waveform in the earlier part of the run.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve attached the inputs, output logs and one comparison plot. The original DAT and CSV files are available if needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/TPS62902_2D00_TSTOP_2D00_small.zip" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-temp-id="TPS62902-TSTOP-small.zip-131372"&gt;TPS62902-TSTOP-small.zip&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: TPS62902: startup waveform changes when only transient stop time is changed</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507944?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:46:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3bb0df7d-ed77-42ae-94e1-957525a7594b</guid><dc:creator>Vidhi Sharma</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507944?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688339/pspice-for-ti-tps62902-startup-waveform-changes-when-only-transient-stop-time-is-changed/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Donghyeon Min,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll check this and get back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vidhi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TPS2663: ERROR(ORPSIM-16362): Name on .ENDS does not match .SUBCKT</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507462?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:35:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:845ae602-78d2-45b2-8b23-ff252afe8d0b</guid><dc:creator>Jai Varma</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507462?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687268/tps2663-error-orpsim-16362-name-on-ends-does-not-match-subckt/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hemanth,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for your response. Using the example schematic, I was able to simulate the circuit, though if I follow the usual steps of importing a library and generating the part, I am unable to simulate the part in that case. I copied the symbol from the example schematic and added the library in the simulation profile, and I am able to simulate the design.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TPS2663: ERROR(ORPSIM-16362): Name on .ENDS does not match .SUBCKT</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687268?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 06:55:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:bd249fea-07e0-45f9-b2a6-cfb8130a5760</guid><dc:creator>Jai Varma</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687268?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687268/tps2663-error-orpsim-16362-name-on-ends-does-not-match-subckt/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; TPS2663&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am trying to simulate TPS26631RGER in PSpice for TI using the official library. I have updated the library in the library section of the simulation profile. I have placed the library in the project folder. I checked online, where they suggested copying the entire library and pasting it into Notepad, and checking for &amp;quot;CRLF&amp;quot; as some ending characters may get cut and cause the error.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet, it&amp;#39;s still giving me this error: ERROR(ORPSIM-16362): Name on .ENDS does not match .SUBCKT. Please suggest how to proceed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TAS67534Q1EVM: Cannot install TAS67534 application in PPC3</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507048?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:839d02c1-0bd4-46f6-a3d0-6a4867e21d62</guid><dc:creator>Shadow He</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507048?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688450/tas67534q1evm-cannot-install-tas67534-application-in-ppc3/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You could try manually install it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Follow below link, and download the .tar.gz file.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a id="" href="https://www.ti.com/secureresources/TAS67534-TAS67624-GUI"&gt;https://www.ti.com/secureresources/TAS67534-TAS67624-GUI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the file could be installed by PPC3, as below picture example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://e2e.ti.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/pastedimage1791596876464v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TAS67534Q1EVM: Cannot install TAS67534 application in PPC3</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688450?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:03:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:109a46d7-61f7-450e-aff8-2ecb15028faf</guid><dc:creator>Marcio Siqueira</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688450?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688450/tas67534q1evm-cannot-install-tas67534-application-in-ppc3/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; TAS67534Q1EVM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I try to install the TAS67534 EVM App in the latest PPC3 release, I get a message saying &amp;quot;Problems occurred during installation of TAS67534_67624. Refresh Available EVM Apps before trying again.&amp;quot; I attempted the suggested refresh several times, and I kept getting the same failure and error message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please advise on how to proceed with the installation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/unnamed_2D00_2.jpg" alt="unnamed-2.jpg" data-temp-id="unnamed-2.jpg-1493744" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: LM5046: LM5046 slope compensation resistor selection issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507036?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:19:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2bbf17ed-dc78-4ea4-97b8-aecb4fd24e19</guid><dc:creator>Guangzhi Cui</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6507036?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687826/lm5046-lm5046-slope-compensation-resistor-selection-issue/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Understand. Thanks for your clarification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>LM5046: LM5046 slope compensation resistor selection issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687826?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:24:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:7e9cd097-d022-4c59-b1ce-f2c613045187</guid><dc:creator>Guangzhi Cui</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687826?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687826/lm5046-lm5046-slope-compensation-resistor-selection-issue/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; LM5046&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi, Teams&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I check the datasheet of LM5046, I found the slope compensation resistor Rslope is calculated as 1.67kohm based on the equation. But in the schematic, the actual value is 3.48kohm (already doubled). Why it is not same as the calculated value, is there any consideration about it? How clould I select this value, also double it based on the calculation value?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/1401.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-83691" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: LMR38020-Q1: Bode Plot Issue for LMR38020</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506904?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:34:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8ae30564-f24c-497a-9390-ad5f95756d63</guid><dc:creator>Tony Koulong</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506904?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688217/lmr38020-q1-bode-plot-issue-for-lmr38020/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ani,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think you did anything wrong, but a transient model are usually not good to run boding measurements. You need more like a frequency domain which we don&amp;#39;t have.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>LMR38020-Q1: Bode Plot Issue for LMR38020</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688217?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:15:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:83bdc9fd-07e6-4365-a28c-54ea10720d27</guid><dc:creator>Ani D</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688217?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688217/lmr38020-q1-bode-plot-issue-for-lmr38020/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; LMR38020-Q1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had designed a 48V-&amp;gt;12V buck converter using LMR38020. I got the model and used Pspice for TI. The Transient Simulation is working fine. I wanted to do the stability analysis using Bode Plot. I am getting my gain plot starting at -48dB instead of 0dB. Have I done something wrong? I used the default Bode Plot (dual Y axis) marker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://e2e.ti.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/Design.jpg_2D00_640x480.jpg" alt=" " /&gt; &lt;img alt="Bode.jpg" src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/8130.Bode.jpg" data-temp-id="Bode.jpg-243528" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: UCC28C43: Old Revision W/ Alternate Characteristics</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506759?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:57:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e4d8f71f-64cd-4071-be3b-130a7773139e</guid><dc:creator>Adhvaidh Aravind</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506759?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1686653/ucc28c43-old-revision-w-alternate-characteristics/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kamden,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reaching out via E2E, and apologies for the delay.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new devices will only follow the latest datasheet (yes, it will &amp;quot;only verify the new window&amp;quot;), and not the old one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is because, for the new material, the the internal bias voltage of the error amplifier is generated in a different way as compared to the old material, due to process technology differences:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://e2e.ti.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/pastedimage1791568431963v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me know if you have any&amp;nbsp;further&amp;nbsp;questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adhvaidh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>UCC28C43: Old Revision W/ Alternate Characteristics</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1686653?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:11:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9079d983-d32c-4b7a-9fcb-6534d31dab76</guid><dc:creator>Kamden Collins</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1686653?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1686653/ucc28c43-old-revision-w-alternate-characteristics/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; UCC28C43&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Three paramaters have changed in the latest datasheet revision bewteen the August 2001 and June 2024 copies available online. The new revision has a VOH min limit of 4.8V with a VREF = 5V.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old version has a VOH min limit of 5V. With the error amplifier tied to VREF, 5V is the max the error amp can go.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During up-screening we are seeing the newer date codes be unable to achieve the old characteristics of VOH and wanted to reach out and see if there was a chance that you&amp;#39;d know if the devices should be able to pass the old requirement or if manufacturing alterations have reduced the window to only verify the new window?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TPS6288X-Q1-DESIGN: Looking for .tsm File for TPS62811</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506588?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 15:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f9d66d89-1fc1-44f1-9396-ae7d2bf7aacf</guid><dc:creator>Kira Singleton</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506588?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1685281/tps6288x-q1-design-looking-for-tsm-file-for-tps62811/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This is for Matchtech Inc., and there is not an NDA. We have updated our project and are now looking for the unencrypted file for TPS62813. Thank you for your assistance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: LM5046: LM5046 slope compensation resistor selection issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506560?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 15:00:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ac0f2ad2-868b-4951-abaa-d510c68b809f</guid><dc:creator>Adhvaidh Aravind</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506560?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687826/lm5046-lm5046-slope-compensation-resistor-selection-issue/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Guangzhi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I understand the confusion here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, if you plug-in R&lt;sub&gt;CS&amp;nbsp;&lt;/sub&gt;= 15 &lt;span&gt;&amp;Omega;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(or an effective of 150 m&lt;span&gt;&amp;Omega;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;due the CS transformer) from the old revision of this EVM, you&amp;#39;d get R&lt;sub&gt;SLOPE ~&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;2.62 k&lt;span&gt;&amp;Omega;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in the &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/snva470b/snva470b.pdf?ts=1791496660053&amp;amp;ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Ftool%252FLM5046EVAL"&gt;latest revision of the EVM&lt;/a&gt;, the R&lt;sub&gt;CS&lt;/sub&gt; has been changed to 18.7&lt;span&gt;&amp;Omega;&lt;/span&gt; (or an effective of 187 m&lt;span&gt;&amp;Omega;&lt;/span&gt; due to CS transformer); the datasheet has the schematic from the old revision I suppose. The same has been reflected in the design calculator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you plug-in this updated R&lt;sub&gt;CS&lt;/sub&gt; value, you&amp;#39;d get 3.26 k&amp;Omega;, and the next standard resistor value was chosen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://e2e.ti.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/pastedimage1791557657762v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Addy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PSPICE-FOR-TI: Spice model file NOT found</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687568?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:14:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a7ce0b5a-186f-442d-9497-1b954785a149</guid><dc:creator>AJAY N</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1687568?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687568/pspice-for-ti-spice-model-file-not-found/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; PSPICE-FOR-TI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp; i am using a THVD1426DR RS485 transceiver ic. now i need a SPICE model,&lt;span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody"&gt;IBIS models&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; for my product EMI/EMC test so, share the supported file&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: Spice model file NOT found</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506483?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:04:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e3f34f6a-08d9-499a-bc91-1188fdc87891</guid><dc:creator>Ethan White</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506483?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1687568/pspice-for-ti-spice-model-file-not-found/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ajay,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately we don&amp;#39;t have a model specifically for the THVD1426. The closest thing we have are the models I mentioned above.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BQ2569X-DESIGN-CALC: Need Spice model for BQ25690RBAR to simulate it in TINA TI</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506436?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:20:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:20bb0733-93c1-4d54-bd20-2be77b6ddf85</guid><dc:creator>Jeff F</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506436?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688366/bq2569x-design-calc-need-spice-model-for-bq25690rbar-to-simulate-it-in-tina-ti/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi E,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TI does not provide Spice models for the charger ICs.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>BQ2569X-DESIGN-CALC: Need Spice model for BQ25690RBAR to simulate it in TINA TI</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688366?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:30:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:eb75c6f9-786e-4ef6-a1f7-4f9ddfba7d01</guid><dc:creator>E Lokeshwar</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688366?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688366/bq2569x-design-calc-need-spice-model-for-bq25690rbar-to-simulate-it-in-tina-ti/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; BQ2569X-DESIGN-CALC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I could not find the Spice model for BQ25690RBAR please guide me finding the same&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TIDA-010210: I can't find the software for this product</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506381?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:43:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f31a779a-e1c3-4644-8f37-44f598c920d7</guid><dc:creator>Vedatroyee Ghosh</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/6506381?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688229/tida-010210-i-can-t-find-the-software-for-this-product/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Davide,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can find the software in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/C2000WARE-DIGITALPOWER-SDK"&gt;C2000WARE-DIGITALPOWER-SDK Software development kit (SDK) | TI.com&lt;/a&gt;. You can find the software under solutions --&amp;gt; TIDA-010210 and download the corresponding version you look for. You will also find the software user guide in the same folder which you can follow for software info and testing procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The latest release notes also mention it&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://dev.ti.com/tirex/explore/content/C2000Ware_DigitalPower_SDK_26_01_00_00/docs/html_guide/RELEASE_NOTES_26_01_00_PAGE.html"&gt;C2000Ware Digital Power SDK: 26.01.00.00 Release Notes&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Veda&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TIDA-010210: I can't find the software for this product</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688229?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:44:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:48696a16-4346-4ca4-a900-86e0bd80e017</guid><dc:creator>Davide Cappellari</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688229?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688229/tida-010210-i-can-t-find-the-software-for-this-product/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; TIDA-010210&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello, I was looking for the software developed for the product TIDA-010210. In the documentation it&amp;#39;s indicated the TMDSCNCD280049C product, but I can&amp;#39;t find anything about this topic in the C2000Ware documentation. Am I missing sometingh? Thak you for the help.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PSPICE-FOR-TI: Unable to Launch OrCAD PSpice for TI – License Error ORCOMMN-12005</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688223?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:28:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6ccab4b5-166c-4ad4-b9c2-48339ff14e42</guid><dc:creator>Rajesh Ketharaju</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1688223?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1688223/pspice-for-ti-unable-to-launch-orcad-pspice-for-ti-license-error-orcommn-12005/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; PSPICE-FOR-TI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello AdrianFer,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I couldn&amp;#39;t reply to your mail as it is locked, but I&amp;#39;m showing the issue:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1653027/pspice-for-ti-pspice-for-ti-unable-to-launch-orcad-pspice-for-ti-license-error-orcommn-12005?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&amp;amp;keymatch=%252520user%25253A620111"&gt;https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1653027/pspice-for-ti-pspice-for-ti-unable-to-launch-orcad-pspice-for-ti-license-error-orcommn-12005?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&amp;amp;keymatch=%252520user%25253A620111&lt;/a&gt;#&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/234/5270.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-108286" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is not resolved by Cadence and even after 5 months this exists. please look in to this and we&amp;#39;re looking for quick support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rajesh Ketharaju.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>