<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Simulation, hardware &amp; system design tools</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/</link><description>Jump start system design and speed time to market with comprehensive designs including schematics or block diagrams, BOMs, design files and test reports.  Connect here to the experts with deep system and product knowledge</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TPS54620DESIGN-CALC: What is the password for TPS543820 design calculation</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1689301/tps54620design-calc-what-is-the-password-for-tps543820-design-calculation/6516130</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2e8f9b91-604a-4262-a181-1eeb8ce2b326</guid><dc:creator>manikandan annamalai</dc:creator><description>I need to take 0.8V, 2.3V and 3.3V with the listed requirements. Please correct if there is any mistake. D43 is recommended as 10000, may be wrong.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AM335X-TMW-IEC61850-DEMO: Proper use of the SysConfig tool aiding design for AM335x - pinmuxing, devicetree etc.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc/6516019</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:931cc22f-6a1a-484b-b3a5-bf12234be198</guid><dc:creator>Bin Liu</dc:creator><description>[quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc/6515909&amp;quot;]I) Any info on point 3) above - documentation, videos on using the SysConfig with Embedded Linux and/or the TI SDK ?[/quote] I am not aware of any. The SysConfig tool itself is self-intuitive, you just need the board design information of the pins to input to the tool. [quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc/6515909&amp;quot;]II) How should I load an external dtsi file in the tool obviously none of the other accompaniment files are not present - am335x_pinmux.h am335x_pinmux_data.c, PinmuxConfigSummary.csv and the untitled.syscfg - I would like to test the old Devicetree file that I have and the modifications that I am working on. [/quote] The tool loads *.syscfg file format, not the devicetree file which Linux uses.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AM335X-TMW-IEC61850-DEMO: Proper use of the SysConfig tool aiding design for AM335x - pinmuxing, devicetree etc.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc/6515909</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:54f159b2-3c0e-4216-9776-cd953c130ca3</guid><dc:creator>Kaloyan Dimitrov</dc:creator><description>I understand, let me take it step by step: I) Any info on point 3) above - documentation, videos on using the SysConfig with Embedded Linux and/or the TI SDK ? II) How should I load an external dtsi file in the tool obviously none of the other accompaniment files are not present - am335x_pinmux.h am335x_pinmux_data.c, PinmuxConfigSummary.csv and the untitled.syscfg - I would like to test the old Devicetree file that I have and the modifications that I am working on. Regards, Kal</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CODECOMPOSER: Need replacment flash burner for XDS510 for TMS320DM642</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690757/codecomposer-need-replacment-flash-burner-for-xds510-for-tms320dm642/6515787</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:92a409d8-9935-401f-98a9-b7c14a8dbb65</guid><dc:creator>Mukul Bhatnagar</dc:creator><description>Additionally here some additional guidance generated by our AI engine , looking through past E2E interactions and support collateral, hope this helps some Short answer The TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE is a workable hardware replacement path for DM642 JTAG access, but your deciding constraint is software, not the probe. Two facts shape the decision: The DM642 can be used with CCS 12.x, but the XDS510 debug probe is supported only through CCS 8.3.1 1 . TI identifies XDS560 USB emulators among recommended replacements for legacy DM642 development hardware 2 , and XDS560v2 probes are supported by CCS on Windows 3 . So moving to an XDS560v2-class probe removes the XDS510/CCS-8.3.1 ceiling and lets you run a currently supported CCS. What you&amp;#39;d need to verify or acquire 1. JTAG connection to your board. The XDS560v2 System Trace emulator connects to standard TI 14-pin and TI 20-pin CTI target headers via documented adapters 4 . The DM642 itself has a JTAG emulation interface for emulation hardware/software 5 . Confirm your board&amp;#39;s header type before ordering, since the exact adapter part number for your board is not established by the documentation reviewed here. 2. Probe firmware/FPGA matched to hardware revision. This is a real-world gotcha on this unit: the QG revision was incompatible with CCS&amp;#39;s default dtc_top.jbc image until the matching firmware/FPGA files were installed 6 , and a newer Rev G unit requires the corresponding CCS FPGA firmware rather than an .exe installer 7 . 3. The correct custom GEL file for your target. A legacy DM642 project was made to connect only after importing the project and assigning the correct custom GEL file 8 . Locate the GEL your original team used — it is as important as the probe. 4. Your existing .out loader should remain the mechanism. Your workflow is sound and portable: the DM642 NOR flash programming approach documented by TI runs target-side code that configures EMIF CE space (CE1 control at 0x01800004 in the example) 9 , maps flash at CE1 0x01400000 with buffers in internal memory at 0x80000000, and uses CSL EMIF initialization before programming 10 . Timing must match the device — one example sets STROBE to 9 cycles and HOLD to 3, with a 32-bit asynchronous interface for programming 11 . Where ARDY is not used, software polling detects erase/program completion 12 . The debug probe only loads and runs that image; it does not dictate the flash algorithm. Gaps you must close before committing I want to be explicit about what I could not confirm: Item Status TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE support in the legacy CCS Flash Burner plug-in Not documented in the sources reviewed 4 CCS v6/v7 specifically with this probe + DM642 Not confirmed; the only version boundaries found are XDS510 ≤ CCS 8.3.1 and DM642 in CCS 12.x 1 Exact adapter P/N and header wiring for your board Not established 4 Two further cautions on the CCS-version choice: legacy DM642 software may require CCS v3.1 SP1-era tooling and DSP/BIOS v4.90 13 , and migrating legacy DM642 work to newer CCS requires project changes while retaining older compiler/BIOS compatibility 14 . Since the Flash Burner plug-in is the one piece of your chain with no confirmed forward path, the lower-risk sequence is: get the probe connecting to the DM642 in your chosen CCS first, then reproduce flash programming by loading your existing .out loader directly rather than assuming the old plug-in UI carries forward. TMS320DM642 upgrading Code Composer — TI E2E TMS320DM642 emulator without PCI slots — TI E2E TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE — TI E2E XDS560v2 System Trace Emulator User&amp;#39;s Guide (SPRU655I) SPRAA51A XDS560v2 SC_ERR_BAD_GENERIC (-100) on USB and LAN — TI E2E TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE installation procedure — TI E2E TMS320DM642 unable to debug — TI E2E Programming Flash on C6000 (SPRA568A), p.5 SPRA568A, p.35 SPRA568A, p.31 SPRA568A, p.32 Looking for Code Composer Studio 3.1.23 Service Pack — TI E2E TMS320DM642 environment for SW development — TI E2E</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CODECOMPOSER: Need replacment flash burner for XDS510 for TMS320DM642</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690757/codecomposer-need-replacment-flash-burner-for-xds510-for-tms320dm642/6515784</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6d8731e5-504c-496c-9b89-d8f72ed1e620</guid><dc:creator>Mukul Bhatnagar</dc:creator><description>Hello Steve DM642 is a very old product and we no longer have any subject matter expertise or doing any active engineering support. So unfortunately I do not know whether you can get away with XDS560v2. It will be best if you reach out to Blackhawk directly to see what their product is capable of supporting.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CODECOMPOSER: Code Composer 4.10 download</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690463/codecomposer-code-composer-4-10-download/6515774</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3f5b747c-3abd-4365-ab26-7bc2de03dbbf</guid><dc:creator>Ki</dc:creator><description>Hi Owen, This old version of Code Composer requires an existing paid license. Did you (or your organization) once have a license for this tool? Thanks ki</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: Add the 3rd Party component library</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690479/pspice-for-ti-add-the-3rd-party-component-library/6515738</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:09680000-a058-4e1a-b402-fe7b307d8e7a</guid><dc:creator>Tatiana S - Admin</dc:creator><description>Hi Jihoon, your question has been answered here: [FAQ] PSPICE-FOR-TI: How do I import a 3rd-party model into PSpice for TI?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: PSPICE-FOR-TI: PSpice for TI: Request to reset/deactivate previous devices (Concurrent device limit reached)</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1691123/pspice-for-ti-pspice-for-ti-request-to-reset-deactivate-previous-devices-concurrent-device-limit-reached</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8603cc0c-54c0-46a9-9048-936588cf000b</guid><dc:creator>SangYul Ye</dc:creator><description>Part Number: PSPICE-FOR-TI Hello, I recently changed my PC and am trying to install PSpice for TI on my new machine. However, I am unable to activate it because I have reached the concurrent device limit with my access key. Could you please reset or deactivate the previously registered devices for my account so that I can use PSpice for TI on my new PC? - My TI Account Email: rkawkxkd@kookmin.ac.kr Thank you for your help. Best regards, SangYul Ye.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/PSPICE_2D00_FOR_2D00_TI">PSPICE-FOR-TI</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: UCC2897A: Schematic Design Review || FlyBack converter &amp; DC-DC Regulators</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1691119/ucc2897a-schematic-design-review-flyback-converter-dc-dc-regulators</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:af044720-b0ee-4cca-94eb-69bb2aac3ebf</guid><dc:creator>Ganeshkumar T</dc:creator><description>Part Number: UCC2897A Hi Team, Please review the attached schematic PDF for our flyback converter &amp;amp; DC-DC Regulator design and let us know if any changes or improvements are required. The Flyback converter is designed to convert a -48V DC input to a 12V DC output for telecommunication application . Kindly review the design and share your feedback, including any recommendations regarding component selection, protection circuits, and overall design reliability. Thanks for your support. Initial_Power_Section.pdf</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/UCC2897A">UCC2897A</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/Wireless%2bInfrastructure">Wireless Infrastructure</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: TP6287x PSPICE Transient model</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1689422/pspice-for-ti-tp6287x-pspice-transient-model/6515604</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:64523f4d-e0aa-48da-ae6c-7652b6caee9a</guid><dc:creator>Jingyi</dc:creator><description>hi Mikeda-san, Thanks for explaining the issue. Sorry but I just noticed a disclaimer from Cadance website. Please let me re-direct this thread to our software team. BR, Jingyi</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: TP6287x PSPICE Transient model</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1689422/pspice-for-ti-tp6287x-pspice-transient-model/6515579</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:73ba8961-0fcb-465b-94bc-e39cae7046b6</guid><dc:creator>Mikeda</dc:creator><description>Hi Jingyi-san, Thank you for your suggestion. I tried to create a Cadence customer account using my work email address. However, during the registration process, I was asked to provide a Host ID, Reference Key, or LMS Key associated with a Cadence license. Since I am using PSpice for TI and do not have a Cadence license or support contract, I could not complete the registration. Could you please let me know if there is a specific registration page that does not require a Host ID, or alternatively, could you share the relevant troubleshooting steps from the Cadence article? Thank you for your support. Mikeda</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: TP6287x PSPICE Transient model</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1689422/pspice-for-ti-tp6287x-pspice-transient-model/6515561</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c3a9fc1a-b639-4caf-9255-625e261ea8a9</guid><dc:creator>Jingyi</dc:creator><description>Hi Mikeda-san, Actually I registered a Cadence customer account manually with work email. Could you please try to register an account as well? It should be public and similar as this E2E forum, and it would be more convenient for you to follow the instructions there. If still not possible, I will try to share the content from Cadance website. Thank you and best regards, Jingyi</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AM64X-ADVANCE-SW: X-talk analysis inputs required</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690369/am64x-advance-sw-x-talk-analysis-inputs-required/6515396</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:06ad9d82-be1f-4826-8ac6-ea15cb8bcefb</guid><dc:creator>Kallikuppa Sreenivasa</dc:creator><description>Hello Damodara Please refer below inputs i received: Some feedback below: For general guidance on design guidelines for PCIe, RGMII and other high-speed signals, the below app notes would be relevant: Parallel interfaces (RGMII etc.): https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sdaa087?keyMatch=high%20speed%20parallel%20guidelines&amp;amp;tisearch=universal_search Serial Links (PCIe, USB etc.): https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spraar7?keyMatch=high%20speed%20design%20guidelines&amp;amp;tisearch=universal_search For specific pass/fail criteria for PCIe/USB/other high speed serial links, pl refer the SPRACV3_AM64x_SerDes_IBIS_AMI_README.pdf document that is contained within the AM6442 IBIS-AMI models. This contains detailed guidance regarding channel simulation setup and pass/fail criteria. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/spracv3/spracv3.pdf Regards, Sreenivasa</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: PSPICE-FOR-TI: TP6287x PSPICE Transient model</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1689422/pspice-for-ti-tp6287x-pspice-transient-model/6515339</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 01:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a609afe4-a013-4be5-8d53-2ca39fe3fdec</guid><dc:creator>Mikeda</dc:creator><description>Hi Jingyi-san, Thanks for checking my question. I am sorry. TPS62783-Q1 is typo. TPS62873-Q1 is correct name. Unfortunately, I do not have access to the Cadence Support Portal because I am using PSpice for TI and do not have a Cadence support account. Could you please share the solution or the recommended actions described in the Cadence article you referenced regarding the COM Wrapper / Server Busy error? Any additional details from the Cadence article would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Mikeda</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DP83869-SCHEMATIC-CHECKLIST-REVC: X-talk analysis inputs required</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690368/dp83869-schematic-checklist-revc-x-talk-analysis-inputs-required/6515125</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:768c2054-1fd6-468a-938d-bb937b5a74af</guid><dc:creator>Shane Hauser</dc:creator><description>Hi Damodara, We do not have specific crosstalk limits for these interfaces. The SI validation criteria we typically look for is as follows: RGMII Ensure the setup and hold timings are met at the PHY RGMII receivers (TX_CLK, TXD0/1/2/3, TX_CTRL,...). There will be a similar setup and hold timing for the MAC receivers which will also need to be met. The DP83869 has controls to tune the RX and TX CLK shift for the RGMII to make these timings easier to meet. Make sure the RGMII signals are routed at 50 ohm impedance and use minimal vias on these lines. RGMII signals should be length matched to within 20mils of the relative CLK (RX signals matched to RX_CLK trace, TX Signals to TX_CLK) Rise time and fall time of signals is typically around 750ps - 1ns. up to 1.5ns may be ok as well, though closer to 1ns would be better. SGMII Route traces with 100ohm differential impedance Length match P/N traces to within 5 mils of eachother XI reference clk Best, Shane</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AM335X-TMW-IEC61850-DEMO: Proper use of the SysConfig tool aiding design for AM335x - pinmuxing, devicetree etc.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc/6514541</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1ee6803c-98f9-450d-ab54-b605aa836208</guid><dc:creator>Bin Liu</dc:creator><description>Hi Kal, [quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc&amp;quot;]Can SysConfig be used to analyse old devicetrees used in say 4.9 kernel and help in the migration to 6.12/6.18 kernel devicetree - dropping the old /dts-v1/; revision and analysing it, indicating errors, fixing issues in it etc.[/quote] Kernel v4.9 is very old, I don&amp;#39;t even remember if it supports devicetree for AM335x devices. The SysConfig tool does support loading an existing pinmux configuration file, but I am not sure if it recognize the pinmux config format from kernel v4.9, if the format has been changed. [quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc&amp;quot;]If one decides on taking an iterative approach on building a devicetree for the new kernel revision how SysConfig should be used to configure interfaces selecting proper pinmuxing per separate interface/function building a Devicetree configuration from scratch step-by-step by generating *.dts/dtsi files or *.sysconf files[/quote] You will configure all the pinx In the SysConfig tool, and save the file &amp;quot;devicetree.dtsi&amp;quot; in the right side of the GUI, then copy and paste the content in its &amp;#39;&amp;amp;am33xx_pinmux&amp;#39; node to your devicetree pinmux node. [quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc&amp;quot;]How should I use in the SDK the Generated files section - the dtsi file looks kind of straightforward what about the rest of the files am335x_pinmux.h, am335x_pinmux_data.c, untitled.sysfg and PinmuxConfigSummary.csv files[/quote] For Linux, you only need file &amp;quot;devicetree.dtsi&amp;quot;. All other files are for different software. [quote userid=&amp;quot;718910&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690085/am335x-tmw-iec61850-demo-proper-use-of-the-sysconfig-tool-aiding-design-for-am335x---pinmuxing-devicetree-etc&amp;quot;]In the central window where the detailed configuration for the pinmuxing should be performed I am not sure how to use the detailed configuration steps - for example my Pull Up/Down and Rx entries stay unaccessable, always grey color[/quote] In your screenshot, the ADC AIN0/1 pins are analog pins, they don&amp;#39;t have corresponding pinmux padconfig registers.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: BQ79616EVM-021: BQ79616EVM-021: Schematic and PCB file</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690473/bq79616evm-021-bq79616evm-021-schematic-and-pcb-file/6514520</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5fc0dd21-5a37-4a05-9794-f8a6a9719bd4</guid><dc:creator>Mohammad Farhan</dc:creator><description>Hi Prashant, You can check this link TIDA-010271 reference design | TI.com . Hope this would be helpful. Regards, Farhan</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: CODECOMPOSER: Need replacment flash burner for XDS510 for TMS320DM642</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690757/codecomposer-need-replacment-flash-burner-for-xds510-for-tms320dm642</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6519c4d4-069f-4331-b4cb-dbf45c685af9</guid><dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator><description>Part Number: CODECOMPOSER Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE Our XDS510 used for programming NOR flash through the TI processor is broken. All engineers associated with the program are gone. We have an APP loader we used the Flash Burner feature to load as well as an &amp;quot;OUT&amp;quot; file to configure the EMIF etc to load the NOR FLASH. What is our best option? Was looking at the https://www.ti.com/tool/TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE paired with a newer CCS version such as V6 or V7 for compatibility. Please help determine what would be required and if this would work well for us. We have a legacy product still in full production and must support. Thank you, Steve Young</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/TMS320DM642">TMS320DM642</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/CodeComposer">CodeComposer</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/tags/TMDSEMU560V2STM_2D00_UE">TMDSEMU560V2STM-UE</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TPS628503-Q1: Hello, I would like to set this question to private.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690372/tps628503-q1-hello-i-would-like-to-set-this-question-to-private/6514423</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f2fabf47-9e53-4a44-8f22-91675b1b38b5</guid><dc:creator>Moheddin Pasha Shaik</dc:creator><description>Hi, I will check internally and get back to you. Thank you &amp;amp; regards, Moheddin.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TPS628503-Q1: Hello, I would like to set this question to private.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-group/sim-hw-system-design/f/simulation-hardware-system-design-tools-forum/1690158/tps628503-q1-hello-i-would-like-to-set-this-question-to-private/6514422</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:efdf1d8c-ce70-4ed4-ad78-248f3f8d82b0</guid><dc:creator>Moheddin Pasha Shaik</dc:creator><description>Hi Deleting few Threads is fine but for the list of threads, i have to check internally. We will get back to you. Thank you &amp;amp; regards, Moheddin.</description></item></channel></rss>