CC2642R-Q1: Package Difference- Footprint Compatibility CC2642R1FRGZR and CC2642R1TWFRTCRQ1

Lindsey Fike

Part Number: CC2642R-Q1

Would these devices be footprint compatible?

0 Ryan Brown1 over 1 year ago

Hi Lindsey,

The CC2642R1 and CC2642R-Q1 are indeed pin-to-pin/footprint compatible.

RGZ = 48-pin VQFN (Very Thin Quad Flatpack No-Lead)
RTC = 48-pin VQFN (Very Thin Quad Flatpack)

Section 8.8, 8.9, and 8.12 of the Datasheet shows the thermal, BLE, and temp sensor characteristic differences between the RTC and RGZ packages.

Regards,
Ryan

0 Roger Espinosa over 1 year ago in reply to Ryan Brown1

Hi Ryan,

Thank you for your answer ,

We want to use CC2642R1TWFRTCRQ1 as alternate part of CC2642R1FRGZR, Do you know if this will have a inpact on the BLE certification?

Regards!

0 Ryan Brown1 over 1 year ago in reply to Roger Espinosa

It should not, however I will pass this to BLE experts to further comment.

Regards,
Ryan

0 Jan over 1 year ago in reply to Roger Espinosa

Hi,

There should be no impact on BLE Certification if you use the alternate, as Ryan mentioned. (Thanks, Ryan!)

Best Regards,

Jan

0 Roger Espinosa over 1 year ago in reply to Jan

Hi Jan,

Thank you very much for your response

What about FCC, IC AND CE certification? Should be no impact?

Regards!

0 Jan over 1 year ago in reply to Roger Espinosa

Hi,

There should be no impact. :)

However, please discuss this with your test house for final confirmation.

Best Regards,

Jan

Bluetooth forum