This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC2592: Impact of vias (viae) on harmonic generation and Faraday cage real estate.

Part Number: CC2592
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2530

Is it a sin to route the Inverted-F antenna on the opposite side of the PCB from the CC2592?  A Faraday cage will cover the CC2530 and the CC2592, but mechanical constraints yearn for the inverted-F to be on the opposite side of the board.  The order of layers (4-layer PCB) will be reversed vis-a-vis the T.I. app note (ground plane 2nd under the antenna).

1) How to maintain a 50-ohm impedance path through the via?  Is this significant or unimportant?  Does the diameter of the via, the thickness of the copper down the via, or other geometric aspects have to be addressed separately?

2) Which devices should, ideally, be placed within the Faraday cage?  For example, is it advantageous or otherwise to include an external RAM component or I/O expander within the cage, or should only the CC2592, or the combination of the CC2592 and CC2530 be placed within the cage?  Should the Balun or discrete filter components be placed inside the cage or outside?  (I assume inside).

3) Will impedance mismatch at zero-Ohm resistor jumpers lead to power loss (transfer) alone, or can these interfaces result in harmonic generation?  What about a curved 50-trace to the antenna?

4) Now, here is the interesting/Poltergeist - a large harmonic is generated at half-primary (1.2GHz).  Can't tell about multiples because my analyzer only goes to 3.2 GHz.  When placing my finger over a zero-Ohm jumper in the antenna trace I can make the 1.2GHz energy go away.  This implies that a capacitor might redirect this half-harmonic energy to ground.  Does this makes sense?

JS

  • Hi,

    - You can have the inverted F antenna on the other side. But I would suggest you do an EM co-simulation for RF performance. This will provide you with insertion    loss and return loss to the antenna power with the via.   Also please submit you design and layout to TI for thorough review.

    - It will be sufficient to place the RF components and RF path inside the shield. We have two designs on line with CC2952 range extender. Please review them.

    - It will be better to look at the layout and comment. But 0 ohm resistance will not generate harmonics but a sub-optimal layout will radiate them.

    - You can tweak the 15nH inductor( use slightly higher value) on the PA power supply and see if the half-harmonic goes away.

    regards

  • Thanks much for your succinct and helpful comments.  I will tweak the 15nH inductor.

    Is there potential for "harm" having other logic components under the shield?

    JS

  • As quick test, not having an inventory of sub-30nH inductors, we placed two 0402 15nH inductors in series.  Had no impact.  I will place the 15nH and 3nH in series to see if this impacts the signal but absent noticeable change with 30nH I am not optimistic.

    When testing via wire (50-Ohm coax to analyzer) the signal is quite clean without harmonics (to the scope limit of 3.2GHz).  No half harmonics.

    JS

  • HI,

    It sounds like you issue is resolved here. I will go ahead and close the thread. Please open the thread up if you are still having an issue or if locked feel free to create a new thread.

    Thanks,

    Riz