Other Parts Discussed in Thread: RF430CL330H
Dear,
my question is about the RF430CL330H "patch code" I have seen in several TI examples.
I am wondering if I am implementing it ok or I am sending the bytes in the wrong order. I attach what probably is the most wonderful screenshot ever :)
As you can see, it depicts one of the transactions, that is writing to the 0xFFEE register.
In my example, first it comes the 0x00 data byte and next the 0x80.
However, since this code I guess is to fix something I really am not aware of since it does not appear in datasheet, I am wondering if may be I am doing it wrong and should be first 0x80 data byte and then 0x00.
If so, I would fix all the rest of writing calls in the "firmware fix".
The "read version" call works ok and returns 0x0201.
The rest of writing functions in the project work ok, since I found very useful the captures in the datasheet.
So, please let me know your opinion! :)
Have a really nice day from Massachussets, if someone is around Cape Cod, I can buy beers :)
