This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LAUNCHXL-CC1310: Measure/Calculate Eb/No or C/N

Part Number: LAUNCHXL-CC1310
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1310

Hi

I want to measure and calculate the Eb/No (energy per bit / noise power spectral density) or possibly C/N (carrier to noise) with my CC1310. 

First of all, is it possible?

If so, how do I measure it? What kinds of signals do I have access to?

Please help me out, I am a bit confused.

Best regards.

  • You can find some information on this in e2e.ti.com/.../1562985

    What is your main goal with the measurements?
  • Hi!

    The link you posted discuss internal receiver SNR.

    I want to measure Eb/No in the air. To get a hint if the position is a good spot to deploy my unit at.

    With the a measured Eb/No value, I can use existing an existing graph to calculate BER for the Eb/No value, for different modulations (CC1310 uses GFSK right?). I want to measure this with only CC1310, is that possible?

    Best regards
  • Eb/No is not possible to measure directly since all receivers will have a given Rx bandwidth. Hence you would need to calculate Eb/No from C/ N and for the later you would need to know the exact power level.

    For your use, you can try to look at the PER and RSSI in combination. A good location should have a better RSSI value (but a better RSSI value can also be due to noise etc)
  • Hi, thanks for the answer!

    This application will only be used for CC1310 and they all have the same Rx bandwidth, right?

    How do you suggest to do the C/N -> Eb/No calculation / conversion ? If possible, do you have any formal source for it (to use in a report)?
    I am asking since I have read about that conversion, but some engineers disagree about it, e.g. this article seems to be popular but have some criticism about as well: http://sss-mag.com/ebn0.html

    If i am not wrong, PER and BER is the same thing? To find a good indication of PER or BER values, to many packets/bits have to be sent to make it useful as a parameter for low energy deployment tool.


    Best regards,
    Tom Karlsson

  • The Rx bandwidth is programmable.

    The Eb/No article I found link to the link you refer to. I didn't read the details but for me it looks like it's highlighting a typical issue: The fundamental theoretical equations is not easy to use in the real world. That is why I recommended looking at PER/ RSSI since this is parameters directly from the RF chip and that shows directly if you have placed the unit a good place. If you go via a theoretical equation you risk that some real life parameters are not taken into account.

    You can calculate BER from PER (en.wikipedia.org/.../Bit_error_rate). How many packets depends a bit on resolution/ accuracy. If you want to measure PER < 1 % you need more than 100 packets as an example.