Part Number: CC3220
Hi team,
can you please advise the questions below:
First to clarify the about our system needs.
• Our system is very low power unit (operating from a battery).
• Today we are using Nanotron chips (propriety protocol).
• We can accept large current for several hundred mili-sec (but most of the day several micro ampers).
• Our system is without any connector or button (it is completely potted).
• The only way to connect to it is via the wifi.
• The wifi chip is used for very small data transfers (several bytes).
• We checking the option to replace the Nanotron chip with TI wifi chips.
We are planning to embed the TI wifi chip in 2 stages:
• The first stage is a quick one, so we will use the CC3220 & connect it to our CPU via the application processor AT command.
• The second stage (for better power & price), our low power CPU will connect to the CC3120 (API).
For knowing if both options above are applicability, we will appreciate some more data about the following issues:
1. When using the CC3220 in idle connect power mode, does the application processor (with the AT command) can be in a low power mode?
- And if so what is the expected current?
2. For calculating the power budget of our battery we need to know:
- Expected time in TX power mode for transferring few bytes message?
- Expected time in RX power mode for receiving few bytes message?
- If we are in hibernate mode & getting command to transmit a short message (via the wifi) and are waiting to reply.
2. how is the best way to work from minimum power point a view:
- Stay in idle connect mode until we get the answer?
- Returning to hibernate mode after the tx end, and check for an answer every second or so?
- Please answer the above question for both the CC3220 & CC3120.
- Every timing that you know about the wifi connection with the appropriate current (power mode), so we can calculate our power budget correct.
3. In our assembly line, we can program the wifi chip for a default connection,
- But after it, the product is totally potted And sent to the field.
i. How do you suggest that we change the connection parameters to the real router in the field?
ii. Using our product as an access point for the above will consume a huge power or am I wrong?
Thanks a lot and kind regards,
Shai