Dear TI support team;
When using the same circuit, the output of LM324 is smaller than that of LM324A. I download the specification and see that the two are the same.
Can you tell me the difference between the two?
Thanks a lot!
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear TI support team;
When using the same circuit, the output of LM324 is smaller than that of LM324A. I download the specification and see that the two are the same.
Can you tell me the difference between the two?
Thanks a lot!
Hello User,
The application circuit requirements may be too great for the LM324 if there is a noticeable change between LM324 and LM324A. Can you give more details about your circuit?
What you do is risky, because the LM324 introduces a considerable additional time delay and phase lag at the VSENSE pin of regulator. Many regulators become instable with such a circuit and need a modification of component values at the COMP pin.
What do you mean by
When using the same circuit, the output of LM324 is smaller than that of LM324A.
That Vout_high is becoming smaller or Vout_low?
Me thinks that R21 plays an important role in your circuit. Have you tried to alter the resistance value to lower values?
Have you noticed that you might violate the common mode input voltage range of U53B?
Kai
User,
To get U53D out of the feedback loop, try change R20 to 4.12k , change R22 to 1k to lower impedance
Then remove D32 and R21. Then short pins 12 and 13 together to test this. (normally I'm not a fan of shorting inputs together)
LM324 has a wider Vos range and U53A has a gain of 100 , so input offset voltage could affect this output.