Hi,
When checking the newly released (P)SPICE model for the LM3886 power amplifier at least two relevant problems were found :
1) The mute pin functionality is inverted : in the model the chip is ON when ZERO current is sunk out the MUTE pin, this is certainly wrong.
2) The open-loop mag/phase bode plot (derived from a closed loop AC analysis in the usual way by dividing Vout by the input differential (Vin+ - Vin-)) is severly off, indicating a unity stable opamp with a phase margin of 75deg! GBWP was found to be not the nominal 4MHz, rather the datasheet max. of 8Mhz was used, not a big deal but still questionable. However, the phase response is more than a decade off in its roll-off, way too high (for example, the real part and datasheet reads 900kHz for the 120deg open-loop phase point, model says 15Mhz... that's even above the UGBW!). Higher frequency poles are there of course, they just seem to be set at wrong, too high frequencies (note that I have developped a reliable AC model of the LM3886 which exactly matches the published graphs and has proven to be realistic in the real world, for stablility analysis). I'm pretty confident in ruling out user errors. Also the strange behaviour shows up with TINA, too, so it is not LTspice specific (I checked in LTspice, others tried in TINA).
3) Less severe but still annoying : Output current is NOT reflected in the supply pins, rather all current is sourced/sunk from the small-signal "GND" pin of the chip.
LTspice puts out the following warnings, maybe that is a hint :
WARNING: Node U1:AV1 is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:OVER_CLAMP is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:P0ZP1 is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:CLAW_CLAMP is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:VSENSE is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:P0Z is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:CL_CLAMP is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:UZ_N100 is floating.
WARNING: Node U1:UZ_N102 is floating.
Could TI/NS kindly check the issue? In the model description there is no statement that AC behaviour is precisely modelled at all except for unity gain BW. I know that TI uses the typical disclaimer in the model that they will take "no responsibility for anything" but publishing a model that questionable does not make any sense to me, honestly.
There is a discussion thread at DIYaudio.com for further information : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/chip-amps/212805-ti-has-new-spice-models-lm3886-lm3875-et-all.html