This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Below part of an email trail between myself and TI support before they suggest I post on E2E which is not what I wanted but here goes:-
"I understand RS provide support but recently I find it useless - they simply attempt to interpret data sheets and have no real knowledge of the products they offer and more important are not aware of limitations of some parts - this is not helped when companies like Vishay and TI buy lines from others and then 're-badge' the data as I think is the case with the problem I have
A colleague placed the LME49724 in circuit making layout changes to replace an AD part that oscillated with usual precautions applied - We did not expect the EN input to draw enough current to pull down a 3.3V 0.5A supply line - I then built the circuit x2 as a simple unbalanced to balanced x1 gain amplifier and with a single 9V supply current limited at 100mA the EN pin draws over 55mA in this arrangement ! The circuit modified with 10kR resistors in place of 1kR all round works as expected but takes more than 25mA with the EN pin left open - when EN voltage is increased the current rises sharply above 1VSo apart from the numerous meaningless graphs relating to noise and distortion the data sheet shows the wrong quiescent current and operation of the EN line - Do you think RS can help ??"
The answer was that RS are not a distributor for TI ???
The demo board circuit shows a link to connect EN to VEE only - The data sheet voltages would suggest EN can be driven by most logic outputs ref VEE but this does not appear to be the case unless using an open collector/drain etc. but then the data sheet also says EN must not be left floating?
At about 1V above VEE the EN input current becomes excessive - connecting EN to VCC as shown in many of the sample layouts and demo circuits for modelling would appear to be a mistake - Also the Quiescent current in all the circuits we have built (not modelled) is about 25mA not 10mA typical 15mA max as stated on the data sheet
Has anyone else experienced the same problem ?
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
This part LME49724 is being EOL'd. You can see it listed in this wiki entry.I would suggest you to take a look at its replacement part.
Best regards,-Ivan SalazarTexas Instruments
In reply to Ivan Salazar:
Not the answer anyone would expect to receive after dozens of emails to TI support and distributors
Perhaps as member of TI you could explain why the part is being discontinued and why I had to come this far to be informed of such ?
The OPA1632, which appears to be a suitable replacement albeit with unnecessary high GBW, data sheet states that the EN pin should or could be left open when not require but what about if we wanted to use this device in our configuration as previously described ? we would of course not be using the low values of FB resistors the data suggests as we don't want the excess dissipation when using a single supply
Can we rely on this data sheet or do we have to build and test an amplifier or 2 using the part to discover that it too may not work with a single supply with the EN pin driven from a logic gate ref. 0V
In reply to Keith Snook:
I don't wish to appear rude but has anyone actually built a single supply amplifier using OPA1632 and connected say a 3.3V logic gate to control EN ref. to 0V ?
The data sheet for the LME49724 reads similar to your last reply but in practice performs as I described in my early posts on the subject - I am surprised no one has tested this even if the part is to be discontinued - or maybe TI have and hence the OPA1632 to replace it
This is the general form of my single ended to push-push convertor used in a larger system - single supply Vcc 9V - DAC run from linear 3V3 regulator - EN pin would be controlled by 3V3 logic gate if this worked as the data suggests it should - open collector gate will drive EN okay or a logic gate with a limit resistor and parallel diode works - resistor values increased to reduce unnecessary dissipation.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.