• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 53 subscribers
  • Views 4238 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CCS5 simulation error "No source available for "c_int00() at 0x1f2d30c""

tanu aneja
Prodigy 10 points


Hi all,

     i have recenty changed to CCS 5 version. The same simulation which worked on CCS 4, but now it  is giving error "No source available for "c_int00() at 0x1f2d30c"". while debugging i found out that program runs smoothly till end , but while coming out of main(), instead of exiting properly it throws this error. some time i get abort() erorr on relase version, but both come at same point. I tried to look at .map file,  0x1f2d30c is the address where c_int00()  is defined. the .map file was automatically generated after providing stack and heap values.

    thanks

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 473441 points

    Hello,

    tanu aneja said:
    The same simulation which worked on CCS 4, but now it  is giving error "No source available for "c_int00() at 0x1f2d30c""

    This is expected. c_int00 is the entry point of the application. c_int00 is defined in the run time support library. By default, CCS does not know the location of the source to the run-time support library. In v4, this warning message was suppressed where as in v5, it always appears. That is why you notice it on v5 and not v4.

    tanu aneja said:
    while debugging i found out that program runs smoothly till end , but while coming out of main(), instead of exiting properly it throws this error. some time i get abort() erorr on relase version, but both come at same point.

    I believe the abort routine is also from the runt-time support library and executes that on program termination. I see the abort routine always get called before it exits in my small test case.

    Thanks

    ki