Part Number: ADS9218 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS9224R , Hi team,
I have simulated the ADS9224&ADS9218 in PSPICE & TINA separately ,and from our datasheet ,the SNR of the two devices ,the ads9218 should better than ads9224, but refer to the noise…
Part Number: ADS9218 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS9219 , ADS9224R
Hi team, you can see the above picture I used such a circuit to simulation the ac and noise performance of the ads9218,with the fin=2KHZ ,amp=3.6V sine wave .and the SNR test result…
Part Number: ADS9218 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS9217 , Hello TI team,
We are planing to use the ADS9218 or ADS9217 (which also would be fast enough).
We already tested out the PADS9218RHAT which worked very well.
So can you tell me when it is…
Part Number: ADS9218 Hello TI team, We are planing to use the ADS9218 with a differential LC filter at its input, driven by a fully differential amplifier. In The datasheet under recommended opperating conditions it is stated, that the input common mode…
Hi Rhea,
The SYNC input on the ADS9218 device family allows synchronization of the over-sampling (averaging) filters in the ADC. A pulse on the SYNC pin resets the over-sampling filter (if enabled) in the ADC - this way all ADCs in the system start averaging…
Part Number: ADS9218 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS7128 , ADS7952 Dear Team,
Do we have suitable solution can replace MAX1239EEE+ ?
Many Thanks,
Jimmy
Part Number: ADS9218 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS9227 Dear TI-Support team
Our company is currently evaluating the ads9218. We already produced a test hardware and are now developing the required firmware. I was able to read and write registers…
Hello Jay,
Yes, this is a limitation of the ADC. As you have noted, the SNR at 500kHz is 84dB, having reduced by about 12dB from 250kHz, per Figure 23. You can expect the SNR to further reduce at 1MHz input by about another 12dB, or around 72dB.
So yes…