Part Number: DS92LX2122 I have the same issue about screen flickering... there is no solution at the end of the thread... would be great to help others to find their problem
Part Number: DS92LX1621 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX1622 , , DS92LX2121 , DS92LX2122 hi，
Question 1: Is there a production shutdown plan for DS92LX1621 and DS92LX1622, and how long is their lifecycle remaining？
Question 2: Can all chips that comply…
Part Number: DS92LX2122 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX2121 , Hi
We are using the DS92LX2121 / DS92LX2122 parts in our display application. I can not seem to get these parts to be reliable, they lose lock or have intermittent I2C errors. I have spent…
Hello Daniele,
you can use the following SER with the DS92LX1622 deserializer. However, all of these devices are older than the DS92LX1621.
DS92LX2121, DS92LV2411, DS92LV2421 ...etc
Same thing, there are other Deserializers, but these are older than the DS92LX1622…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX2121 , DS92LX2122 , DS90UB925Q-Q1 , DS90UB926Q-Q1 I am looking for assistance in troubleshooting an I2C issue with my circuit. I am using the DS92LX2121/DS92LX2122 in display mode. The DS92LX2121 (Serializer) is connected…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX2122 , DS92LX2121 , DS15EA101 Hi, all,
the Serializer and Deserializer IC DS92LX2121/DS92LX2122 are a part of our measuring equipment. Both sides are defined as "slave", because the distance is over 20m. We have also…
I am having some difficulties with the I2C control channel in an imager setup.
First question: Should the Index and Match registers contain the same address, or different (alias) values like in this application note for a different SER/DES pair? http…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX2121 , DS92LX2122 Hi,
If the Serializer (DS92LX2121) is not physically connected to the Deserializer (DS92LX2122) what can I expect the states of the GPO[0:3] pins to be at the Serializer?
My system has an option were…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LX2122 Hi all,
It is GRAPHTEC, my user. As for the document of April 2013 which there was a statement when bit [7:5] of the register 0x27 was set to [111] and it could avoid, but had come to hand, a register has a statement…
