Part Number: SN6501 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ISO6742 Hi team,
Could you please review this part on the schematic? It is on page 4, U3.
One thing that looks strange to me is I believe this can only provide a 3.3V or 5V isolated rail. However, the…
Hi Minghao,
Thank you for your question.
What the customer is implementing in their system looks good and their approach is correct.
Although the ISO7242M will work for the application, we recommend to use the ISO6742, which also supports using the CS…
Part Number: ISO1640 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ISO6742 , ISO7742
Hi, Support Team
about below schematic, have any concern.
SDA2 and SCL2 could connect GPIO?
if any suggestion, Please advise me.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Lawrence
The ISO1640 has up to 710 mV on side 1, and 400 mV on side 2. So side 2 would be compatible with the P82B96.
Unidirectional signals are easier to handle. It might be possible to place the P82B96 on the other side of the isolator, and to use separate TX…
Hello Mark,
Thank you for your question. With the device off on both sides, the input will not propagate to the output and the output is mostly going to 0V.
Applying an input when the input side VCC is not powered is going to violate the input absolute…
Part Number: BQ75614-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXS0102 , ISO6742 Hi,
on our BQ75614EVM as well as in a couple of other threads, we recommend using ISO7342 on UART connection between MCU and BQ75614:
- why do we recommend an isolation instead of…
Part Number: ISO7242C-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ISO7242C , ISO7242M , ISO6742 Hi ,
We are using ISO7242MDW part in our existing design. However we decided to replace former part with ISO7242CQDWRQ1. I compared parameter and found that both are almost…
Quickly find solutions to common questions about digital isolator devices by clicking this link. This FAQ answers the most common questions asked about these devices …… ……… …
FAQ: Isolation >> Digital Isol…