TI E2E support forums
TI E2E support forums
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • E2E™ design support >
  • Forums
    • Amplifiers
    • API solutions
    • Audio
    • Clock & timing
    • Data converters
    • DLP® products
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Logic
    • Microcontrollers
    • Motor drivers
    • Power management
    • Processors
    • RF & microwave
    • Sensors
    • Site support
    • Switches & multiplexers
    • Tools
    • Wireless connectivity
    • Archived forums
    • Archived groups
  • Technical articles
  • TI training
    • Tech days
    • Online training
    • Live events
    • Power Supply Design Seminar
  • Getting started
  • 简体中文
  • More
  • Cancel


Search tips
Showing 4 results View by: Thread Post Sort by
  • RE: LM63625EVM: LM63625EVM

    Youhao Xi
    Youhao Xi
    May I assume the issue is resolved and we can close this thread? You can re-open it by adding a new post. Thanks, Youhao
    • over 2 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: LM63625-Q1: source rail requirements on the LM63625.

    Andrew Kutzler
    Andrew Kutzler
    Hi Amine, Please refer to the recommended operating condition for this part. reference design https://www.ti.com/tool/LM63625EVM Thanks, Andrew
    • 10 months ago
    • Arm-based microcontrollers
    • Arm-based microcontrollers forum
  • LM63635-Q1: EMI spec

    Roy Chou1
    Roy Chou1
    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: LM63635-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM63625EVM Team, We use LM63635-Q1 to achieve Vin = 26V, Vout = 12V, Iout = 2.5A. Could you let me know whether this part could pass below EMI test? Is it easy to pass if we follow the layout? …
    • over 4 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • RE: LM63615-Q1: About noise performance evaluation

    Andy  Chen
    Andy Chen
    Resolved
    Hi Koji, Pls modify the LM63625EVM external components to be exactly same as the circuit you will test on LM63615 EVM. The radiation noise performance should be the same because of same IC package, PCB layout and circuit. B R Andy
    • over 5 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

  • Ask a new question