Part Number: LMH1218EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH1219 , LMH1218 , Hi Experts,
Good day. I have this case from client about interfacing with LMH1219 EVM:
"I've a HD/3G test pattern generator feeding to IN0 (single ended) on the LMH1219 EVM, then…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH1218EVM , USB2ANY Hi team,
My customer asks us whether LMH1218EVM kit includes USB2ANY, USB cable and Flat cable. Please let me know.
Best regards, Fumio Nakano
Hi Shaoping,
Register 0x02 = 0x58 shows device is locked but HEO/VEO values are 0x00. HEO/VEO values show eye is closed. Please read register 0x02 many times since i expect device to go out of lock.
Also, please use different CTLE settings since LMH1218…
Hi Itoh-San,
Please refer to AN-1187 figure 21. B=0.2 mm, C=0.1 mm, and A=2.6 mmX2.6 mm.
Please attached note LMH1218EVM pcb layout as well. SV601076.brd
Regards ,, Nasser
Hi John,
This is unexpected. Given CDR is locked we should observe HEO/VEO - otherwise device will not be locked.
1). Please confirm customer is indeed using correct methodology for reading/writting into the registers. Please note below FAQ for details…
Part Number: LMH0324 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH0318 , , LMH1218EVM , LMH1218 , LMH1219EVM , LMH1219 Hi Team,
We would like to ask your help regarding the customer's inquiry below.
I'm planning on developing a HD-SDI 2:1 switch using 2 x LMH0324…
Hi Kawai-San,
I have used USB2ANY box with the LMH1218EVM. On USB2ANY software I turn on 3.3V supply. Then - this turns on 3.3V on USB2ANY connector. Under this condition - I was able to run LMH1218EVM GUI and I did not have to make any change on the…
Hi Alan,
You can use LMH1218EVM for this test. These two devices have the same performance.
I was thinking about this and why there is a difference between Phabrix and Tek WFM you noted earlier. In some implementation of the FPGA at SD rate, SD rate is…
Hi Eric,
Something doesn't look right. You are getting 1.15UI of alignment jitter. I suggest if you can please get one of our LMH1218EVM for correlation and check/correlate with your own result. I expect far less jitter.
Another thing you can try…
