Answered

• LSF0204-Q1: LSF0204-Q1 VEN

  

  Hiroaki Kikuchi

  Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204-Q1 Tool/software: I have a question regarding the circuit design of the LFS0204-Q1. If I design it with Vref-A = 2.3V, Vref-B = 3.3V, VEN = Vref-B, I understand that there should be no issues with the voltage tolerance of the EN pin…

  • Resolved

  • 26 days ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• LSF0204: LSF0204 related issues

  

  jeno.zhang

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDA-01014 Tool/software: Hello， As shown in the figure below, the recommended maximum value for Ven in the data manual is Vrf-A, but the Ven on reference design TIDA-01014 is directly connected to…

  • 1 month ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• LSF0204: LSF0204

  

  CHI JONG JANG

  Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Tool/software: I understand that it is correct to configure the translation between 1.8V and 3.3V to [An=1.8V / Bn=3.3V], but can it also be configured to [An=3.3V / Bn=1.8V]?

  • Resolved

  • 3 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• LSF0204: Smaller package size than LSF0204

  

  Hale Tan

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXU0304 , TXU0104 , TXU0204 , TXB0104 Tool/software: Hi team, Do you have smaller size 4bit level shifter recommendation? Now we can find LSF0204 with 2*1.7 size.

  • 3 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• LSF0204: Push pull operation GPIO UART, are output resistors neccesary?

  

  Lars Wallden1

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Tool/software: Hello, I am looking at a design using the LSF0204 for the following purpose: Translate 2 GPIO unidirectional and UART Rx and Tx unidirectional (4 channels total). The A port is at 3.3V, and the B port at 1.8V 1 GPIO…

  • 20 days ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• LSF0204: LSF0204 vs LSF0204D

  

  Jonathan Navor

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Tool/software: Hi Team, Good day! I am posting this on behalf of the customer. They are using LSF0204 in their design but the manufacturer has mistakenly used LSF0204DRUTR instead. As per data sheet LSF0204DRUTR requires LOW Active…

  • 5 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• LSF0204: LT not able to translate from 1.8V to 5V at frequencies above 5MHz

  

  Elbin Thomas

  Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXU0304 , Tool/software: We are using LSF0204RUTR for our design we are able to communicate to CAN IC upto 5MHz via SPI if i go higher than 5Mhz(to10Mhz), i am not getting any response from the CAN…

  • Resolved

  • 1 month ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• LSF0204: QSPI support

  

  R.Fukunaga

  Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Tool/software: Hi all, I would like to use LSF0204DPWR in QSPI I/F line. 1. I want to use it in QSPI I/F(Bidirectional, no direction switching signal). Can I use it without any problem? 2. In case of QSPI, is pull-up resistor unnecessary…

  • Resolved

  • 3 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• LSF0204-Q1: Input abnormal after running under -40C

  

  Chuqiang Wen

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LSF0204 , TXU0202 , TCA9800 , TXU0102 Tool/software: Hi team, Customer met one issue which need your help. You can find the schematic, description and waveform as below. Description: After running…

  • 4 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• LSF0204: no RPU

  

  Jeff YANG

  Resolved

  Part Number: LSF0204 Tool/software: Hi, If our design forgot using RPU, and it cause B side voltage level only ~1.13V, May I know the minimum voltage level? And it may have reverse risk when only B side voltage level higher than A side? Thanks! Je…

  • Resolved

  • 5 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.