Part Number: MSP430F4783 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CCSTUDIO , TMS320F28027 , MSP430WARE Tool/software: Hi,
I am using ccs 12.7 to write code for a msp430f4783.
This is a "old" project which started development on ccs v4 and it is only now that…
Hi, David
Sorry, I didn't have enough information.
Supplement.
toshiharu.yoshie said: In this case, will it be an IQN (IQ5 or less) that will not reach 16777216 even if it is doubled?
Regarding this, when I looked at the user guide (page 10, Table…
Hi, Cash
Sorry, I omitted a lot of what I asked before (URL in the first sentence).
… MSP430F6769A: Regarding improving accuracy of A/D conversion - MSP low-power microcontroller forum - MSP low-power microcontrollers - TI E2E support forums
…
Please check if this thread can give you some help: https://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/msp-low-power-microcontrollers-group/msp430/f/msp-low-power-microcontroller-forum/883866/ccs-msp-iqmathlib-how-to-make-a-library-for-msp430/3270285?tisearch…
Thomas Foxcroft said: what does the _iq15 specifier mean?
It's a fixed point 32 bit fractional number used in the IQ Math Library. Useful when using the MPY since it's a fixed point multiplier.
https://www.ti.com/tool/MSP-IQMATHLIB
Hi Himanshu,
We do provide both floating and fixed point libraries for mathematical operations on the MSP430F5132 microcontroller. They are installed by default with new Code Composer Studio installations, and can be utilizing by using #include "math…
Hi,
ickim said: 1. The names of libraries in TI web site are quiet confusing. Following library names are the same or not?
- Ultrasonic Sensing Gas Metering Library, Ultrasonic Sensing Flow Metering Library, USSFlowLibrary, USS Library, USS SW Library
…
Hi Stephen,
I'm not familiar with these files/functions, but they may be related to the printf() or sprintf() functions. However, if you search the forum, you'll find that this isn't recommended for a MCU. There are other novel ways to get around floats…
Hello,
Are you using the MSP-IQMATHLIB division with LEA? That's probably the most efficient way to perform division outside of implementing everything in assembly. I would recommend that you look for ways to eliminate or reduce the number of divisions…
