Hi Troels,
This document has information about the internals of MSP430 BSL. It has a links to example code as well.
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa450g/slaa450g.pdf
Please let me know if you have more questions.
Regards,
Evan
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 Hi
It seems the receiver of the eUSCI in UART mode requires the number of stop bits selected by UCSPB to receive correctly.
Is this correct?
It is not explicit described how the UCSPB setting influence TX and RX individually…
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 2021年12月1日 星期三
11:27
The specific error cases are as follows：
error #10367-D: output section ".TI.persistent" cannot mix noinit sections with sections that require initialization.
NOINIT sections:
- .TI.persistent…
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TEST Hi team,
The customer has the following 2 questions when testing LEA:
1. The customer uses the result obtained by adc and directly multiplies by LEA, and the result is incorrect: (The complete…
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 Hi team,
For calling LEA to FFT transform the data collected by the ADC, since the ADC is collecting int16_t type data, but TI provides API functions of type _q15/-q31, is it possible for LEA to use the int6_t type directly for…
Part Number: MSP430FR6047 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MSP430FR6007 , , MSP430FR6005
Whether MSP430FR6047， MSP430FR6047 ，MSP430FR6005 and MSP430FR6007 are pin to pin.The schematic diagram and PCB can be interchanged without changing。
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MSP430F6779A Hi TI Team,
I have gone through the datasheet of MSP430FR6007.
In our application required 16 Channel Sigma delta ADC. I have read in datasheet USS block has High-performance high…
Part Number: MSP430FR6007 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MSP430FR6047 Hi,
what are the differences between the MSP430FR6007 and MSP430FR6047 besides the metering interface?!
Thanks
Best regards
Steffen
Hi Foz,
The <100ps dToF accuracy is referring to the accuracy after calibration. Although the offset you are seeing is unusually high, it would still be considered a dToF offset problem(not an accuracy problem). I've sent you a friend request for further…
