Part Number: SN65HVD35 Hi Team,
As shown at "Pin Functions" of datasheet, RE pin is "Digital output". But as it is "Receiver enable" I think it should be "Digital input", am I right?
Beat Regards, Tom Liu
Part Number: SN65HVD35 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD32 Hi, I am looking for a TVS diode or chip varistor for bus protection of SN65HVD32. CDSOT23-SM712(Bourns) is used for protection devices in the data sheet.
Q1.I would like to use the following…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD35 hi
i am using the SN65HVD35 for RS422/RS485 interface.
is there any reference design i can compare to?
do i need to use a TVS at the output?
Part Number: SN65HVD32 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD35 , Hi support team,
Our customer is considering RS-485 communication with switching full - duplex or half - duplex. Therefore I am studying whether full-duplex RS-485 transceiver can be used…
Hello Hao-san, Max-san,
Thank you for your reply.
Do you have any data of cable length for THVD1452 at Vcc=3.3V?
We're using SN65HVD35 at present. If it was exchanged for THVD1452, can we extend the transmission distance?
Best Regards, itabi
Hao-san
Thank you for reply,
Please see additional question below;
①About datasheet figure 15, SN65HVD33 is not reach 500ns_typ and 900ns_max.
I guess that Driver Enable Delay(Datasheet P11) is only SN65HVD35 condition, is it correct?
And, are VOD…
This spreadsheet tool makes it easy to look up what the recommended pin to pin capable RS-485 transceivers to replace old TI RS-485 transceivers.
/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/138/1777.Recommended-New-RS_2D00_485-parts-for…