Part Number: SN65LBC179 Hi,
The customer is using "SN65LBC179DR". The latest PCNs have changed thermal resistance values.
Question Is the change in thermal resistance due to a process change? Or is the measurement method different?
“Junction…
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN55LBC180 Hello team,
Do we have HBM and CDM rating for SN65LBC179QDRG4?
Best regards,
Shotaro
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Hello team,
Can SN65LBC179 be used for an automotive application? TI.com says the rating is Automotive and Catalog.
Best regards,
Shotaro
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THVD1551 , , TPD2E007 Hello,
I have a customer who is looking to use the SN65LBC179Q but needs their solution to meet IEC 61000-4-2 standards. Do you have a recommendation for additional circuitry/parts…
Part Number: SN65LBC179A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65LBC179 Hi, I'm considering between the 179A and 179. What are the differences between them and what should be considered in order to pick one over the other?
Thanks
Shane
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Good morning everybody,
I'm using a SN65LBC179Q in a digital differential transmission. With 5m cable everything is spick and span, however, when using a 50m cable, the signal looks odd at the sender side:
The graph shows…
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Hi,
We have developed a filtering interface for the RS422 communication protocol using the SN65LBC179AD component.
I have done a simplified schematic of the filtering interface :
This box is inserted in the serial communication…
Part Number: SN65LBC179 When checking the resistance values to Ground from Pin 8 (Differential Input A) and Pin 7 (Differential Input B) I am getting values higher than I expect. Based on the image below from the datasheet and some quick calculations…
Part Number: SN65LBC179 Hi,
It is described that "Multipoint Data Transmission" on the datasheet.
However, this device doesn't have output hi-z mode.
How can we construct "multipoint data transmission"?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi …
You can use any full-duplex transceiver. To reduce EMI, use a transceiver with the lowest possible maximum signaling rate.
The SN65LBC179 would work. The THVD1512 would be cheaper, more robust, and use less power.
