Answered

• SN74ALVCH16373: 1.8V Timing

  

  Sean Rauchfuss

  Resolved

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVCH16373A Logic team, For SN74ALVCH16373, in the datasheet the Timing Requirements for Vcc = 1.8V has a note "This information was not available at the time of publication." Do…

  • Resolved

  • 8 months ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• SN74ALVCH16373: thermal resistance (theta JB and theta JC) values needed

  

  alison jago

  Resolved

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 Please provide the thermal resistance values (theta JB, JC) and max junction temperature. Thank you.

  • Resolved

  • over 6 years ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• SN74ALVCH16373: Timing Requirements

  

  Scott Asher

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVTH16373-EP , SN74ALVC32 Hello. I have some questions regarding timing parameters for the SN74ALVCH16373. The timing requirements tW, tSU, tH refer to figure 1 in the datasheet. The input…

  • over 7 years ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum
Answered

• SN74ALVCH16373: Input overshoot max?

  

  Scott Asher

  Resolved

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 Hello, I have some questions regarding input overshoot max on SN74ALVCH16373. The datasheet just has absolute max rating of Vi = Vcc+0.5V. But I assume this is a DC spec and not a dynamic overshoot spec. When simulating at…

  • Resolved

  • over 7 years ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• SN74ALVCH16373: Seeking characterization data for this part

  

  Tom McTaggart

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 We are interested in seeing timing data outside the -40/+85 degC data sheet range. We have been given data for some ALVC gates and would like the same kind of data for this latch. This is very helpful in our design assurance…

  • over 7 years ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

• SN74ALVCH16373: EOL issue of ZRDR package

  

  Lee, Sam

  Part Number: SN74ALVCH16373 Hi team, It seems that SN74ALVCH163ZRDR is not sold and it's been replaced by 74ALVCH163ZRDR. Are both devices equal on package, pin layout and performance, ot not? Thanks.

  • over 7 years ago
  • Logic
  • Logic forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.