Part Number: SN74LV126A Hi Folks, Looking at the SN74LV126A buffer, the device's functional description conflicts with the function table in the datasheet:
Most of the datasheet indicates the OE to function as an Active High input, can we confirm…
Part Number: SN74LV126A Hi,
Good Day.
I'm looking at the SN74LV126A datasheet.
It says "The SN74LV126A devices are quadruple bus buffer gates featuring independent line drivers with 3-state outputs.
Each output is disabled when the associated…
Part Number: SN74LV126A Hi, Team,
I am looking for the IOH(max)@VCC4.2V. Could you open the spec?
Please contact directly to me if off-line discussion is needed.
thanks,
Best regards,
Koh
Part Number: LSF0108 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXU0104 , SN74AXC4T774 , SN74LV126A , SN74LXC8T245 , SN74LV125A , SN74LXC8T245-Q1 , Hi,
We are planning to use LSF0108QPWRQ1 for bidirectional GPIOs of our processor board, wherein each line can be configured…
Part Number: SN74LV126A Hi Sir:
About SN74LV126A . Read the datasheet I think the OE is high active.
The ’LV126A devices feature independent line drivers with 3-state outputs.
Each output is disabled when the associated output-enable (OE) input…
Part Number: SN74LV126A Hello E2E Logic Forum Members,
Would you please let me know a series resistor value in the ESD Input Protection Circuit ?
For example ...
Advanced High-Speed CMOS (AHC) Logic Family (SCAA034C) Page 2. Figure 1.
www.tij.co.jp…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LV126A , SN74LV244A Hi Sir,
Sorry to bother you.
We would like use buffer IC " SN74LV126A " for SPI interface.
The SPI spec bandwidth is 16MHz.
Does SN74LV126A is suitable solution??
If not, could you share…
You can replace the SN74LVC126A with the SN74LV126A, which does have the I off feature. (In the linked answer, I did not make clear that LVC and LV are different families.)
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LV126A , SN74LV125A Hello,
It is written to the datasheet of SN74LV126A that the active level of the OE terminal is HIGH. However, table 1 of the datasheet is written in active LOW. Which is right?
Best Regards,
Tomo