Part Number: TIDA-060029 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDA-00629 Tool/software: Hi :
I have also been testing TIDA-00629 recently. Could you please send me the documentation as well?
Hi Bincy,
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the delay.
Bincy VK said: I need one more suggestion for Bust and surge which kind of protection circuit need to add for reducing the common mode noise in EMC
TI digital isolators I/O pins typically…
Part Number: SN55HVD233-SEP Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TCAN337 , TIDA-00629 , ESD2CAN24-Q1 , ESD2CANFD24-Q1
For the sn55hvd233, apart from the 100 nF and 10uF bypass caps, are any other passives required, e.g. termination resistors etc ... figure…
Hi wenhao song , The ISO1050 device might be able to withstand 87V for 20ns however 3kA lightning current is a bit too high for the device. You have to use necessary protection components to achieve bus protection. Please go through the TIDA-00629 reference…
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for reaching out.
If the ±80V requirement is for transients that last a few 10s of µs or less than the best way to protect against such transients is to use TVS diodes. The TVS diodes work very well to clamp transients to the clamping…
Hi Howard:
Thanks for posting your question on E2E.
The small jump in the CANH-CANL waveform appears to be due to a reflection. In order to identify the source of reflection, I'd recommend removing the following components one at a time and measure…
Hi Ann,
Thanks for reaching out. Both the common-mode choke and CAN bus capacitors (both common-mode and differential capacitors) are meant for EMI noise filtering. They are effective for reducing emissions from device and also for suppressing external…
Hi Muhammad,
Based on your description and the waveforms you provided from your testing, it seems like the CAN driver has been partially damaged and is no longer capable of driving a dominant (logic 0) state. Because this damage occured in the field…
Hi MAX,
I have additional questions about TIDA-00629.
① IEC61000-4-5
IEC Table 6 of Page.13 shows that IEC SURGE(KV) of TVS only is ±2kV.
However Table13 of Page.21 shows that the result of TVS only (±2kV) shows fail.
Does it mean ok untill…
