Part Number: TPD12S521 HDMI_PDF.pdf
Hi Team,
We are using the HDMI TPD12S521DBTR in our design. I am unable to detect HDMI and 5V. Please see the attached schematic for reference.
For communication, we are using NVidia jetson nxn processor to TPD12S521DBTR…
Part Number: TFP410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD12S521 Hi team,
My customer would like to use TFP410 to output HDMI signal. Could I use TPD12S521 to protect the port?
If yes, The pins of TFP410 do not have CEC/DCLK/DDAT/HPD. Can I leave them unconnected…
Part Number: TPD12S521 Hi!
We have a very similar set up and problem as in this previous question:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface-group/interface/f/interface-forum/1114255/tpd12s520-hdmi-output-not-working/4130130?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch…
Part Number: TPD12S521 Hello,
Datasheet recommendation section 7.3 has the typical at 3.3V. But I would like to know if 1.8V can be used on LV _ Supply pin.
Thanks,
Rez
Part Number: TPD12S521 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD1E05U06 Hi, I am using a SIL9022A with a TI TPD12S521.
Note the SIL9022A states it does not require a pull on CEC with IO voltages of 3.3v. I have the IO at 3.3v on the SIL9022A driven from an…
Part Number: TPD12S521 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD5S115 , TPD4E02B04 Hi Team,
The customer used TPD12S521 before, it only supports HDMI 1.4. Do we have the HDMI 2.0 Interface Protection Solution?
Thanks a lot.
Matthew Chen
Part Number: TPD12S521 Hi,
My customer wants to connect “5V_OUT pin on output side” with 5V power for pull-up of DCLK_OUT/DDAT_OUT, and never connected 5V on input side and 5V on output side. Is it correct connection? Please advise us.
Thanks…
Part Number: TPD12S521 Hi, My customer has the following questions. Could you please answer them?
*1. According to the following figure.2 on the datasheet P.1, DCLK_OUT signal is pull-up on 5V. Also, on Sink side, 47kohm pull-up is required on DCLK_OUT…
Part Number: TPD12S521 Hello team,
According to the DS 11.2 layout example, the input and output patterns are connected at both side on the board via the IC.
In this case, I think it seems like the both PCB trance and IC's impedance should be considered…