Because of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., TI E2E™ design support forum responses may be delayed from November 25 through December 2. Thank you for your patience.
Part Number: TPS25750 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25792 , , TPD6S300 , TPS54531 , TPS25751 , ADS1262 , TPS54120
Tool/software:
Hello Sir/Madam Please help us to check our schematic ( attached as pdf ), we are using TPS25750 + BQ25792 + TPD6S300 solutions…
Part Number: TPD6S300 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65987D , TPS65994AD If there are no controller, what should we do with CC1/CC2 pin. should i just no connect it?
Thanks
Part Number: TPD6S300A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD6S300 Hi, I'm currently using TPD6S300A and found that TPD6S300 has better availability. I did not find any distinguish differences in the datasheets, Only difference I spot is the OVP recovery…
Part Number: TPD6S300 Hi Team,
My customer colay this part with others. So they would like to know if Pin19 and Pin 20 could be tied to ground or not if unused.
Please help to advise.
Thank you.
Jim
Part Number: TPS25750 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD6S300 , TPS65987 , For TPS65987, the CCx pins are tolerant only to 6V, so there are TPD6S300 existed in the reference design. But for the newer TPS25750, the CCx pins are 26V tolerant, and OVP is…
Part Number: TPD6S300 Datasheet mentions RPD_G1 to connect to C_CC1 and RPD_G2 to C_CC2.
We are actively debugging and it would be easier to flip them. Can we connect RPD_G1 to C_CC2 and RPD_G2 to C_CC1?
Thanks!