Part Number: TPD6S300A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPD6S300 Hi, I'm currently using TPD6S300A and found that TPD6S300 has better availability. I did not find any distinguish differences in the datasheets, Only difference I spot is the OVP recovery…
Part Number: TPD6S300A My customer is using our TPS6D300A to protect their Type C port. Do they need to connect Rpd_gx to CC if their system is source-only and will have system power all the time?
Thanks,
Dan
Part Number: TPD6S300A Hey Interface team,
I have a customer evaluating the TPD6S300A for a new design and we are curious to better understand what approach to salt and tap water corrosion prevention this product has as compared to a device like the…
Part Number: TPD6S300A Most USB Type C Port Protector provides ESD protection on D+/D- USB lines which will protect against transient over voltage but not steady state short to Vbus.
TPD6S300A USB Type C Port Protector addresses steady state short to…
Part Number: TPD6S300A Hi,
Customer has a need to implement an option of bypassing TPD6S300A. They implement this by adding 0ohm on SBU1/SBU2/CC1/CC2 signals between type-c connector and system side. When they need to bypass TPD6S300A, they'll not mount…
Part Number: TPD6S300A Hello Team,
My customer is using the TPD6S300ARUKR port protector IC in a design only for SBU Signals.
Is it ok to leave CC (C_CC1, C_CC2, CC1, CC2) signals floating?
CC lines protection will be taken care of separately…
Part Number: TPD6S300A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65994AE , TPS65994QFNEVM , , TPD6E05U06
Hello team,
My customer is considering TPS65994AE for USB type-C, and they are going to use Alternate Mode for Display Port.
TPD6S300A is used in…
Part Number: TPD6S300A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65987 Hi everyone,
I'm working on a TPS65987 implementation on my own design but I have realised that there is not stock for TPD6S300A component. Is there any alternative on stock right now…
