Part Number: TPS22948 Hi,
For TPS22948 I don't find the leakage current specified in the datasheet when the switch is in the "OFF" state, I would like to know the current that flows from the switch when pin 3 (ON) is low, and pin 6 (OUT) is at 0V. This…
Part Number: TPS22948 Hello,
Please tell me the country and address of the factory name of TPS22948DCK Fab, Assembly and Test. Please provide information on all factories that manufacture TPS22948DCK. For example, if there are multiple assembly factories…
Hi Gui He,
I have tried to plug in TPS22948 as the load switch for my buck converter TPS563300 to observe the load transient. When i shorted the load, the voltage obtained is zero, as you can see in the waveform.
The test setup is shown below. I think…
CBT switches are designed for TTL signals, which do not actually go near 5 V. The switches are implemented with plain N-channel MOSFETs with the gate at 5 V, so with the signal at 5 V, the transistor is off.
There are proper analog switches using tranmission…
Part Number: AM623 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS22948 , TPS22917 Tool/software: Customer looking at the AM623 datasheet "SPRSP58A – JUNE 2022 – REVISED NOVEMBER 2022" and on SDIO Electrical Characteristics where it talks about the SDIO interface…
Thanks Praveen.
Hi Sharu,
It looks like you would run into issues with the device oscillating between input batteries when their voltages are very close. Before I start discussing solutions to this issue with you, I want to run another idea past you to…
Part Number: TPS22992 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS22917 , TPS22916 , TPS22948 Hi Team,
How can an implementation of parallel load switches with common outputs be configured to remove issue of reverse body diode currents?
Do we have another device…
Siburaj,
Yes, the slew rate calculation is in microseconds per volt, so the conversion would have to be done from microseconds to seconds if you want to convert.
" worst-case calculation" is pretty open- but it seems that you have all the right parameters…
Hi Matt,
The reason I was asking about your source is because we have devices such as the TPS22948 which offers Reverse Current Blocking. However, these devices allow for a reverse current of about 200mA which can damage certain batteries. Thank you…
Hi Paul,
Have you tagged the correct device? TPS22964C has no over current protection. This device has reverse current blocking.
Devices like TPS22948 and TPS22919 are examples of devices with some form of over current protection by way of either a current…
