Part Number: TPS53667 Tool/software: Hi team.
I have several questions regarding PMBus specification. TPS53667 is daisy-chained with PMBus and I2C in my customer's usecase.
1. is it possible to do daisy chain with PMBus and I2C on same bus(data line…
Part Number: TPS53667 Tool/software: Hi team,
I have a question regarding PMBus communication of TPS53667.
1. My customer plans to access TPS53667 from master device via PMBus using 100kHz communication, not 400kHz communication. Is it possible to work…
Part Number: TPS53667 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CSD95490Q5MC Tool/software: Hi team,
My customer has been designing the multiphase DCDC converter using TPS53667 x 1pcs and CSD95490Q5MC x 2pcs, and has technical questions. Could you please kindly…
Part Number: TPS53667 We are using Schematic as
TPS53667EVM-769
we can read IC addresss , but NO PWM ouput from TPS53667 ,if you have the experience
please Let me know to do ?
THS
Hi Luo,
Let's take a look on this threads.
TPS53667: how to Select TPS53667 at Fusion Digital Software - Power management forum - Power management - TI E2E support forums
Best regards,
Jack Su
Part Number: TPS53667 we want to know How select TP S53667 at The Fusion GUI?
The Fusion GUI will open with the rail associated with the TPS53667 controller on the [System View]
screen as shown in Figure 27 . If this were a power system that was populated…
Part Number: TPS53667 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS53676 , Hello team,
I have a couple of questions to know how different TPS53667 vs TPS53676.
1) Do the both devices equip a same PMBUS control format?
2) Are the both devices have a different SMBUS…
Part Number: TPS53667 Hi Experts, I am not able to export design of DCDC converter from Webench power designer in Orcad schematic format. It is able to export in Altium format. Orcad format will be useful.
Please help. thanks, Abhijit
Part Number: TPS53667 Hi Team，
Want to check on behavior of clear_fault command.
To my understanding，it will clear all fault currently，but if the fault is still there，when reading fault register again，the fault but will be set again，right？
BRs
Given
