Part Number: TXB-EVM Hello,
I am looking for TXB-EVM board dimensions and any 3D CAD files associated.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Brooks D'Antonio
Part Number: TXB-EVM Hi Experts, Our customer have a question regarding product: TXB-EVM. There appear to be mounting holes on this board, could you please provide the dimensions? Kind regards, Gerald
Part Number: TXB0102 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXB-EVM Tool/software: I would like to simulate the TXB0102DCUR which is bidirectional voltage level shifter it is not available in Pspice for simulation. It only has IBIS model can you able to provide…
Hey Thomas,
There is the TXB-EVM that can be used to evaluate TXB0106, but currently do not have any test socket boards for level shifters. You may need to check with external vendors.
If needed, please provide additional details on failure case for further…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LSF0101
FAQ: Logic and Voltage Translation > Auto-Bidirectional Level-Shifters > Current FAQ
In most cases, it is recommended to test with the device EVM instead as it yields much more accurate results under specific…
Hi Michael,
This waveforms we tested it on the eval. board without any load.
The input is given to one of the I/O through square wave generator and output is measured on the Oscilloscope. I am not sure the lumped capacitance of the trace.
We have ord…
Hi Andrey,
The most likely reason that you see the shift is because there is no reference to between the EVM and spectrum analyzer. To do this you should be able to provide a 10MHz reference to the EVM through LMK_CLK_IN SMA. When this is applied the…
Hey Chris,
Unfortunately, there isn't a SPICE model for this part due to the internal one shots of the translator. It is explained further in this FAQ: https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/787588/faq-why-is-there-no-pspice-model…
Hi Gireesh,
My understanding is that there is an internal pullup on the TXB IC. So while the hardware changes you made thus far are correct, I believe you will still run into the same issue as the SoP mode will be incorrect. Anyways, we can check with…
