Because of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., TI E2E™ design support forum responses may be delayed from November 25 through December 2. Thank you for your patience.
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM10011 , UCD9222-EP , TMS320C6678 , UCD9222 Hi, I need to power the variable core supply CVDD of TMS320C6678 multicore processor. As a smart-reflex solution, I can opt for either an analog controller LM10011 or a digital controller…
Hi John,
Thanks John. These are follow-up questions for further clarificaion:
[1] But which one is better in terms of performance (one is analog and the other digital)?
[2] LM10011 looks less complicated than UCD92xx-EP. Are there any known issues that…
Part Number: TMS320C6654 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM10011 , TPS53681 , UCD9222 , UCD9222-EP , TPS54424 , TPS54521 , TPS65400 Hi!
I have a new design with C6654 and I saw the evaluation board uses C6657 and UCD9222 but UCD9222 is NRND and the recommended…
Hello， Thanks ， Weidong，I found there is a UCD9222-EP which is p2p compatible with UCD9222. What's the difference between this two components？Is there any need to modify the hardware to use UCD9222-EP ? Why TI recommended TPS53659 instead of UCD9222…
Part Number: UCD74120 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320C6678 , UCD9244-EP , , TPS40422 , TPS40428 , TPS40322 , UCD9222 , UCD7242 Hi TI team,
In our design, we have two TMS320C6678 DSPs (D0 and D1). The variable core voltage (CVDDD) for each the DSPs consumes…
Hi, you did not answer the question. Is the device UCD9222-EP form-fit-compatible with UCD9222 device? I looked at the datasheet and they have same footprint and package. I am wondering why you do not suggest that component UCD9222-EP as replacement. …
