NE5532: 413111

Part Number: NE5532
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1678

Tool/software:

Hello TI team, 

am reaching out because I’m currently assisting a customer, Ember Industries, Inc. They have contacted us regarding some issues they are experiencing with the chips. Please find their comment below:

"

We are having some problems with part number 5500068 ( NE5532DR) chips
failing. Please see the attached pictures.

The 1st picture is a "good" chip, the 2nd picture is a label from a reel
that the "good" chips came from, Made in Mexico

The 3rd picture is a "bad" chip, the 4th picture is a label from a reel
that the "bad" chips came from, Made in Malaysia

They are both TI NE5532DR chips both purchased from Mouser, but the "bad"
chips are burning up on startup and the "good" ones work just fine when
placed on the same location on the same board.

Our lead engineer contacted TI directly and was told that since we
purchased through Mouser, we needed to contact Mouser and then you would
contact TI.

We have 2 full reels of 2500 and a used reel all from Malaysia.
Can you please contact TI in regard to this issue?"


Please advise on next step to take. Thank you. 

  • Hi Janett, 

    The 1st picture is a "good" chip, the 2nd picture is a label from a reel
    that the "good" chips came from, Made in Mexico

    The PCN has issued in NE5532 product due to RFAB change. Both pre-PCN and post-PCN are in the inventory currently. 

    The "good" ICs, made in Mexico is likely manufactured by pre-PCN process. The "bad" ICs (made in Malaysia) by the customer is likely the post-PCN good that is related to the information below. 

    https://mm.digikey.com/Volume0/opasdata/d220001/medias/docus/5726/PCN20231114002.1.pdf

    Both pre-PCN and post-PCN products are equivalent, but they may have some differences (e.g. GBW and open loop output impedance etc.). If the customer is able to send us the schematic, we can review the circuit and make a suggestion to compensate for the post-PCN op amp product. It is likely that it is op amp stability related issues in post-PCN product. Please specify the findings that are associated with "bad" behaviors, so that we can correct the behaviors for the customer's product.  

    If the customer does not want to post the schematic in public forum, please post a "friendship" request over E2E, and we are able to establish a communication via E2E private messaging system. Please let us know. 

    Best,

    Raymond 

  • Raymond, 


    I appreciate the fast response. I will get back to when I received a response from customer service. 


  • Hi Janett, 

    Ok, please let us know. 

    Best,

    Raymond

  • Hello Raymond, 

    The customer responded with the below information:

    "For information back to TI via Mouser:

    In the application where we are experiencing failures of NE5532DR and it
    has been identified as post PCN inventory that is failing, in our circuit
    application we are employing power rails at +/-20 VDC.

    We have been building our product with these power supply rail voltages,
    which are within the +/-22VDC ABS MAX specifications, for 15+ years and
    have not experienced any failures related to the supply rail voltages
    until now with the post PCN parts.

    The post PCN parts appear to be failing immediately and catastrophically
    when supply voltage rails of +/-20VDC are applied.
    Additionally, we have numerous other products where we employ +/-18VDC
    power rails and have also seen significant rise in failures on these
    products where post PCN parts have been placed.

    Our usage of +/-18VDC and +/-20VDC are within the ABS MAX specification of
    the parts but the post PCN parts appear to be unable to tolerate the
    specified ABS MAX voltage.

    We need to be able to utilize NE5532DR parts without regard to pre/post
    PCN conditions.

    The post PCN NE5532DR parts are clearly not meeting your published
    specifications therefore we propose and demand this issue to be escalated
    for immediate resolution.

    This a very serious problem and we need to know how to move forward."



  • Hi Janett,

    Additionally, we have numerous other products where we employ +/-18VDC
    power rails and have also seen significant rise in failures on these
    products where post PCN parts have been placed.

    I understand your frustration. However, the pre-PCN NE5532DR's max. supply ratings is up to ±22Vdc, and the recommended operating voltage is only rated up to ±15Vdc or total Vs = Vcc - Vee <= 30Vdc (single supply rail). 

    The post-PCN NE5532DR is rated at the similar range, slightly higher in the recommended operating voltage up to +/-16Vdc, NOT +/-20Vdc. In addition, the abs. max. voltage rating in the post-PCN is rated slightly lower up to 36Vdc (36Vdc in single supply rail, or +/-18Vdc in dual supplies), which is the abs. max. ratings. 

    If your product has to withstand +/-20Vdc in abs. max. ratings, then please consider OPA1678 or similar audio amplifier product. OPA1678 is a low cost and high performance audio amplifier. In terms of recommended operating voltage, it is still considered as 36Vdc in a single supply or +/-18V in dual supplies. 

      

    Here is our precision audio op amp link. 

    https://www.ti.com/product-category/amplifiers/op-amps/audio/overview.html

    If you have other questions, please let us know. 

    Best,

    Raymond