This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Some questions about CC85XXDK-HEADSET for an underwater intercom for divers project



Hello TI community,

It's been awhle I'm looking for an embedded device to build an underwater intercom for divers.

The CC85XXDK-HEADSET can fit to my project, as it is bidirectionnal, but I have some questions.

a) What is the RF output power of the CC85XXDK-HEADSET? What will be the distance range in salt water?

b) What is the sensivity of the audio interface input, i.e. can I  connect directly a dynamic microphone or it needs a preamp to have "line in" level (1 Vpp)?

c) Is it possible to configure slave or master (or both) in a kind of "VOX control", to avoid acoustic feedback? (such a level detection on the mic input that enable emiting signal)

Thank you for your help.

Best regards

Emmanuel.

  • Hi,

    I don't think that PurePath will give you the range under water that you are looking for. PurePath is operating in the 2.4 GHz frequency band, which has a very poor range under water. I don't have any data on the specific range for CC85xx, but in I would guess that in general the range is well under 1 m for a 2.4 GHz system in salt water. Maybe even under 10 cm for most systems.

    Best regards,

    Johan 

  • Thank you Johan for your answer.

    I received my PPWA evaluation kit today. It works perfectly but I'm dispointed that it won't work underwater. I need a short range (10m). Whatever i will try to integrate the 2 PCB in waterproof box and test it.

    Best regards

    Emmanuel

  • Hi Emmanuel, 

    It will not work at 10m..my bet is not more than an inch or two.
    Came across this paper why googling the subject:

    Underwater Wireless Sensor Communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM Frequency Band
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355409/

    PPW differs from 802.11b/g in many ways (modulation, output power etc), but since the most limiting factor is the 2.4 GHz wave-length not propagating well in water it's not a bad study.

    Regards,
    Kjetil