This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TAS5630B PBTL channel balance

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TAS5630B

We are developing a multi channel PA amplifier with transformer-coupled 100V line outputs using TAS5630B chips.  Our 4-layer pcb with TAS5630B chips works perfectly in 2 x BTL mode, with identical measured gains on each of the two BTL outputs from the same chip.

We wish the amplifier to be able to work in 2-channel BTL mode (2 x 125W) or in 1-channel PBTL mode (1 x 250W), so we have two balanced output filters, two separate output transformers, and the paralleling of the output will be done at the secondaries of the output transformers.  As I said, the 2 x BTL mode works perfectly.

To check single channel PBTL mode I set the board for PBTL operation in AD modulation mode. (We are using AD mode to reduce the level of common-mode EMI on the long 100V speaker lines).  The single balanced audio input was applied to inputs 1/2, but I deliberately did not connect the BTL ouputs in parallel, so that I could measure if the signal level at each output was the same, so that there would be no re-circulating currents flowing between the two outputs when they are paralleled.  To my surprise, the output of the ch 3/4 section was 2.25% higher in the output ac voltage (measured at a 1kHz sine wave) than ch 1/2.  As the paralleling of the audio path is done inside the TAS5630B, I would have expected the two output levels to be essentially the same, especially as this is the case when the board is in 2 x BTL mode and each channel is fed with the same signal.

I don't want to parallel up the outputs without understanding why there seems to be the gain imbalance in PBTL mode between the two halves.

What is the expected channel balance between each half of a PBTL stage?

Many thanks,

Chris Morriss.

  • HI Chris,

    Let me refer you to a colleague on this.

    Regards,

    Matt

     

  • Hi Chris,

    Interesting observation. Were you driving any current into a load? Could the inductor component mismatch, PVDD bulk caps, trace resistance contribute to the output mismatch? By the way, in additional to good layout, it is important to keep the output filter inductance to a min of 7uH under all conditions.

    reg,

    Paul.

     

  • Yes, each output was resistively loaded with a resistor set to give a 100W load at full output.  The pcb layout is very good, and the switching waveforms before the output filter are very clean, with no trace of ringing at all, though of course a 4-layer board with an unbroken ground plane makes life much easier here!  The output inductors are the shielded ID17A-100M 10uH parts from Ice Components, which have a very high current before they show any signs of saturation.

    Surprisingly, with an input signal set to provide an output level 10dB below maximum, there was no difference in the supply current taken by the amplifier if I left the loads on the two channels independent, or if I connected the loads in parallel, indicating that the gain difference was having little or no effect on the parallel operation.

    I wonder if the internal pre-filter NFB path in the TAS5630B operates differently in parallel mode, and only works correctly in this mode if the outputs are actually paralleled together?