This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TLV320AIC3204: Do you have any formula to calculate 0dBFS=?Vrms

Part Number: TLV320AIC3204

Hi ,

I'm using TLV320AIC3204, in datasheet there can only find this "Input signal level (0dB) Single-ended, CM = 0.9V 0.5Vrms"

But I want to know if I use differential input with CM= 0.9V, which is the full-scale voltage (0dBFS)?

Do you have any formula to calculate 0dBFS= x Vrms ? Both input and output.

Thanks.

  • Hi, Lee,

    The Full-Scale Voltage depends of the CM voltage and the kind of input/output. All the datasheet specifications are made for a single-ended input as you found. In the case of the differential input/output, the full-scale voltage is duplicated. For example, in your line above, the full-scale voltage would be 1Vrms for a differential input.

    "Input signal level (0dB) Differential, CM = 0.9V 1Vrms"

    Best regards,
    Luis Fernando Rodríguez S.
  • Hi Luis,
    I tested on the EVM board. But I found about 2dB difference.

    Audio Source : 1kHz, 10mVrms=-40dBV
    EVM setup: CM = 0.9V, differential input on IN3L/IN3R, MIC PGA GAIN = 20dB

    The source is -40dBV, and the MIC GAIN is 20dB, so the record audio should be -40dBV+20dB=-20dBV.
    Because full-scale is 1Vrms=0dBV=0dBFS, the record audio should be -20dBFS.
    But I analyze the recorded audio file ,the Max level is about -22dBFS.

    There is about 2dB difference .
    Why does this happen? Dose it the attenuation on input route?

    Thanks.
  • Hi, Lee,

    When the analog input is as low as 10mVrms, there could be risk of gain error. You may notice that if the analog input is near of the full-scale voltage, the PGA gain will be more exact. So, I would recommend to increase the analog input signal to have better results.

    Best regards,
    Luis Fernando Rodríguez S.