This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPA3118D2: TPA3118D2/TPA3116D2 SNR

Part Number: TPA3118D2
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPA3116D2,

Dear Sirs,

My customer asked us about SNR of TPA3118D2/TPA3116D2.

The specifications of these data sheets are 102 dB in the Typical condition.
However, when they measure it is said to be very different from 102 dB of spec.
So I measured it with AudioPrecision with EVM of TPA 3118 D 2 and it was Lch: 83 dB, Rch: 92 dB.
The measurement conditions are
Use EVM: TPA 3118 D 2 EVM
Measurement condition: VDD: 24 V
The input signal was adjusted to 1 kHz, and the level was adjusted to be the distortion-free maximum.
Load resistance 4 Ω
Gain: EVM setting as it is: 26 dB

I have the following question.
What is the measurement condition of 1.102 dB?
2. Please let me know if there is anything else you can think about the difference in EVM measured values.

Best Regards,

Y.Hasebe

  • Hi Hasebe-san,

    The measured SNR result could be different between different boards. But it should be around the data shown in the datasheet(102dB). The test condition is as below:

    PVCC=24V, Load resistance =4Ohm, Gain=20dB, Input signal = 1kHz sinewave. The data is based on TPA3118D2 EVM. Measured with AP2722.

    Did you enable the BW from <10Hz to 20kHz please? And did you enable A-Weighting filter in the measurement setting? Please make sure the GNDing between the board and the instrument is good enough. Please don't use too long cables(power supply, output/input...) for this measurement. How much noise level did you get during the measurement?

    Best regards,

    Shawn Zheng 

     

  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your reply.

    The test condition is the same except for the gain setting.
    I am using AP 2722.
    Gain setting is a default condition of 26 dB because it is not possible to change EVM resistance constant.

    Did you enable the BW from <10Hz to 20kHz please? 

    ⇒Yes I did.

    And did you enable A-Weighting filter in the measurement setting? 

    ⇒Yes I did.

    Please make sure the GNDing between the board and the instrument is good enough. 

    ⇒I think the Gnd connection may not be enough.

     I think that it is hard to strengthen the GND quite enough depending on the measurement environment.

     Please tell me how much cable and GND strengthening is necessary for reference.

    How much noise level did you get during the measurement?

    ⇒I do not know the noise level during measurement.

     For example, does the noise level mean the value of the AP when the EVM is powered on?

     

    Best Regards,

    Y.Hasebe

     

     

  • Hi Hi Hasebe-san,

    Thanks for your reply. Could ypu please let me know your test procedure for the SNR measurement? To calculate the SNR, we need to know the noise level and signal level. Please let me know how much they are.

    Best regards,

    Shawn Zheng

  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your reply.
    Measurement method of SNR is as follows

    *Hardware
    Connect EVM and AudioPrecision (AP)
    Input is connected by pin cable at Unbal - GND.
    The output is connected to AUX - 0025 via a load resistor and it is connected from AUX - 0025 to the AP.

    *Software (AP)
    The input level is set to the maximum value of the distortion level (measured value: 9.8 V) while monitoring the output waveform.
    At that time, set the dB value of AP Analyzer to 0 dB.
    Turn OFF the output of AP Generator and read the dB value of Analyzer.

    I also noticed some points.
    In our AP, A_weighted filter and AES 17 Filter can not be turned on at the same time
    When 20 kHz _ AES 17 filter is turned ON, it does not become 102 dB, but it is more than A-weighted
    The measured value approaches.

    Does your measurement have 20 kHz_AES 17 filter turned ON

    Best Regards,
    Y.Hasebe
  • Have question about circuit, go to https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/

    Buy electronic product, go to  http://www.kynix.com  or http://www.ti.com/

    About robot or project ,go to https://www.instructables.com/

    About arduino,go to https://forum.arduino.cc/

    About signal,system,control ,go to http://archives.math.utk.edu/

    Electronic components industry news,follow: https://twitter.com/Kynixsemi

    learn electronic knowledge, go to https://facebookcomshaynechen79.wordpress.com/

    About circuit,go to http://www.discovercircuits.com/list.html

    Any question about general electronics, go to: http://forum.electronicsforu.com/

  • Hi Hasebe-san,
    Thank you for the detailed explanation. If you are using 24V power supply, the RMS voltage value on the output with 1% THD should be be larger than your 9.8V(should be close to and less than 24/1.414=16.9V). Could you please double-check?
    Could you please try to turn off the input signal on the AP output and measure the noise level on the load by AP? It should be uV level. I turnned on both 20kHz filter in band setting and A-weighting filter in this measurement. If only one is available in your instrument, I think 20kHz band filter should be enabled.
    How about you power supply on the board? Please use a good quality power supply for this measurement. Please also try with 20dB Gain setting, there maybe some difference between different Gain setting.
    Best regards,
    Shawn Zheng
  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your reply.

    I found a one-point mistake.
    Since the distortion occurred during EVM setting without distortion output, the input level was controlled to 9.8 Vrms.
    However, we found that the load resistance derating was about 25 W.
    I will try measuring again.
    However, A-Weighted and FILTER of AES 17 can not be used at the same time.
    So I will measure using AES 17 only.

    Best Regards,
    Y. Hasebe
  • Hello Shawn-san,

    I measured again.
    Turn off the input signal of the AP output and measure the noise level of the load by the AP.
    ⇒ I confirmed.
    NoiseLevel = 145 μV.

    For the load resistance, the output waveform was monitored by raising the derating to 50W.
    However, the monitor output waveform gradually clips and ShutDown will occur.
    That is when you monitor FaultPIN it goes LOW. I will return later.
    It will become its symptom repeatedly.
    So I turn off input once. (To protect the device)

    So, I think that something is being protected from this symptom
    I think that OCP or OTP is working from the symptom that the output waveform of this EVM starts to clip.
    Will not this happen with EVM?
    By the way, the EVM used is TPA 3118 D 2 EVM REV.C.

    Best Regards,
    Y.Hasebe
  • Hi Hasebe-san,
    Thanks for your reply. To avoid the thermal fault, please apply input signal on one channel instead of both.
    The noise level is a little higher than expected. It should be less than 90uV. Please meaure the noise under ambient temperature. Don't do it when the device is still very hot. I think you could also check your setting on AP GUI(e.g. input configuration, BW/Fltr setting...) Try with both single-ended and differential input mode(sellect JP1 and JP2 on EVM).
    If you get a more than 12V RMS signal and less than 90uV noise, the SNR could be larger than 1002dB easily. Please let me know if you have more question on this measurement.
    Best regards,
    Shawn Zheng
  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your reply.

    I measured ambient temperature.

    Ta=25℃

    The device is in the cold condition. 

    And I measured 1ch only.(1 load connection)

    Then I tied to measure noise level.

    1.differential input

      AP⇒ON、PowerSupply⇒On, No input,Input Configuration⇒Bal-Gnd

      Noise Level≒500uVrms

    2.Single end input

      AP⇒ON、Power Supply ON, No input,Input Configuration⇒Unbal-Gnd

      Noise Level≒500uVrms

    If you get a more than 12V RMS signal and less than 90uV noise, the SNR could be larger than 102dB easily

    ⇒ So I turned off the EVM power as an experiment.

     Then the output noise was about 100 uVrms.

     I know your suggestions.
     However, I can not exclude the basic noise floor including EVM.

     Also, I connected both loads, I pulled out the input cable and measured it.
     The result was 75 uV rms, 85 uV rms.
     When turning on the power supply under this condition, it was 220 uVrms, 440 uVrms.
     I think that the variation between CH is a problem of measuring instruments and measurement conditions.
     In any case it will not be 90uVrms.

       

    Best Regards,

    Y.Hasebe

  • Hi Hasebe-san,

    Thank you for the detailed explanation. The noise floor is around 100uV even when the power supply is off? This is not expected. It should be 0V in this case. I believe there is some setup issue in your measurement. We have a lot of materials about audio performance measurement on TI website. You can check them for your reference: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa114/slaa114.pdf   http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa068/sloa068.pdf  

    Best regards,

    Shawn Zheng

  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your reply.

    The noise floor is around 100uV even when the power supply is off?

    ⇒No The noise floor around 0uV when the power supply is off.

        I confirmed it today and it was 0v.

     I'm sorry for the confusion.

    We have a lot of materials about audio performance measurement on TI website.

    ⇒Thank you for your information.

        I already knew both App Notes.

    However, I believe that this problem is due to measurement system (environment) rather than measurement procedure.
    Because there is no description of AES 17 Fliter in the data sheet, it is measured only by A-weighted.
    However, since A-weighted alone does not become the value of the data sheet, we think that AES 17 filter is important.
    Is this correct?

    Best Regards,

    Y.Hasebe

  • Hi Hasebe-san,

    Thanks for your reply. I agree with you that it looks more like a measurement setup issue. For the performance measeurement on a class-d device, low-pass filter setting(e.g. AES17) is always necessary. In SNR measurement, A-weighting filter is also enable. For now, I think the key is the noise measurement with 20dB gain setting and input disabled. Could you please try with the other instrumemnt which support this configuration?

    Best regards,

    Shawn Zheng   

  • Hello Shawn-san,

    Thank you for your quickly and kindly reply.
    I will try to measure other instruments.

    Best Regards,
    Y.Hasebe