This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

PCM2902C: PCM2902C Low Input Volume

Part Number: PCM2902C

I am using the PCM2902C in an application where I am digitising am single analogue audio signal, using the left channel analogue input only.

The AC voltage range (signal) on the analogue left channel input is in the range -1V to plus 1V

When I record the signal from the CODEC with Audacity, the maximum volume appears to be only half the full range.

When I record the same signal through my PC sound card the volume is more than double. 

Note: This also seems to be the case when I test with the evaluation module. 

Is there anything I can do the record the full dynamic range?

  • Hi, Steven,

    Welcome to E2E, thanks for your interest in our products.

    It is possible that the software used to record audio from the codec has different gain settings. I have seen Windows adding a +20dB gain if the codec is detected as mic input device, not line input device. Do you see a difference on the waveform captured with one or other software? Or, is the only difference the amplitude of the signal?.

    Can you please provide more information about the test procedure so I can try replicating it in my EVM?.

    Best Regards,

      -Diego Meléndez López
       Audio Applications Engineer

  • Diego, 

    Thanks for reply..

    I have done comparison tests on both iMac and Windows 7 with similar result. 

    Today I did a comparison on Windows between a regular sound card the PCM2902C and using an audio recording program called Intune http://www.gammaspectacular.com/marek/intune/index.html

    This recording software displays the dynamic range in arbitrary units -100 to +100 arb.u.

    The volume ratio between the TI codec to sound card was 6/100

    The only difference in the waveform in this case was that the sound card inverted the pulse.

  • Hi, Steven, 

    Thanks for the feedback. With the information provided it is still unclear why the input of the PCM2902C has a low amplitude, because the input signal you are providing is aligned with the expected for a full-scale output on the digital side.

    I tested the EVM in a recording application using audacity, a 2Vpp input signal was applied to the EVM input and I was able to get a full-scale digital signal. 

    This makes me think that this issue is caused by an incorrect setting of the device configuration by the OS.

    Best Regards,

      -Diego Meléndez López
       Audio Applications Engineer

  • Thanks Diego,

    I appreciate you taking the time to test this for me, please let me carry out some more tests on my side before replying.

    Steven
  • Hi Diego,

     I tested the codec again today with Audacity, this time I hooked up my scope across V common pin 14 and V Left input  pin 12, and adjusted my pulser to just under  Vpp 2.0V.

    On the attached image you can see that the digital signal barely makes it above 0.1 on the vertical scale. 

    I am using 3.3V regulated supply on pin 10 (Vcci) and VBus 5.0V on pin 3.

    The volume from my circuit is similar to the evaluation module and across both my Mac and Windows computers. 

    Pulse height resolution is critical to my application , so any suggestions would be welcome. 

    Steven

  • Hi, Steven,

    Thanks for the feedback. I am wondering if this issue has something to do with the input configuration you are using. Is it possible to share your schematics?. Why are you measuring the input signal across VIN and VCOM?. Typically, a GND centered signal is provided to the analog inputs before the decoupling cap.

    Best Regards,

      -Diego Meléndez López
       Audio Applications Engineer

  • Diego,

    My circuit is simple,  just an opamp with variable gain, and has the inverting input floating at 1.65V.

    I tested the evaluation module again today with a 2V Vpp sine wave and it agreed with your test, so I figured there had to be something wrong with my circuit. 

    I removed the biasing resistors on the inverting input of my opamp and this solved the problem.

    Thanks for your help.

    Steven