This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ADC12DJ5200-SP: Powering VA11 and VD11 separately

Part Number: ADC12DJ5200-SP
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADC12DJ5200RFEVM, TPS7H1101A-SP

We are trying to figure out the limitations with separating VD11 and VA11, if any. Initially we were planning on matching the power tree shown in Figure 8-3 of the datasheet, which supplies both rails from a common LDO.

We ran into an issue where the combined max current from VD11 and VA11 exceeds the 3A max output current of the TPS7H1101A-SP, when accounting for EEE-INST-002 derating of 80%. For this reason we determined our safest course of action would be to separate them to two regulators. It seems the ADC12DJ5200RFEVM powers VA11 from different regulators (one a buck and one an LDO), so this approach has merit. One caveat: the below note from the datasheet implies there can be issues when VD11 and VA11 are not sequenced correctly and/or don't track.

Can you please clarify what issues we need to look out for when deriving VA11 and VD11 from different regulators? Our preferred solution would be to use 2x TPS7H1101A-SP sharing an enable input. Is there a max permissible deviation we need to maintain in normal operation & during power-on?

  • Hi Azad,

    There shouldn't be any power sequencing issues between the VA11 and VD11, I would just make sure to follow the other requirements in that power sequencing section you screenshotted. On the EVM we use a buck and an LDO on the analog supply to help with performance, this is not as important on the digital supply as it is not as big an issue.

    Best,

    Eric Kleckner