This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TLV5637 reference pin

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV5631, TLV5637

Hi,

If I use the internal voltage reference is there anything I need to do to the REF pin - leave floating or add a small cap?

Cheers

Calum

  • Calum,

    Based on what I see in the TLV5631 Data Sheet on page 4, you should have 10 uF in parallel with .1 uF on the ref output pin.

  • Thanks Jeff,

    Looking at page 5 of http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tlv5637.pdf it indicates a max load capacitance of 100pF only. But I assumed this value is only if you are using the internal reference to drive another device? I am only using the ref internally (not using it to drive another device)so do I need to do anything with the Ref pin?

    Cheers

    Calum

  • Hmmm....Somehow I think that the ref circuits in the 5637 and 5631 are the same but the Load C specs are different. In the 5631 DS it says...

    "A decoupling capacitor must be connected to the REF pin if internal reference is selected to ensure output stability.A 1 mF to 10 mF capacitor in parallel to a 100 pF capacitor should be sufficient, see Figure 13."

    I'll let BU Apps. for these devices clear this up.

  • Hello,

    These TLV products are quite old and I do not have any documentation available concerning the reference connection for the TLV5637. Based on the functional block diagram for the device I do not see any need for extra decoupling, especially since this is only a 10-bit part, as the bandgap voltage is buffered and driving two more high impedance buffer stages.

    What's the application for this part? Are there particular concerns for additional reference decoupling?

  • Hey Kevin,

    When you say extra decoupling what do you mean? Should there be a 10uF in parallel with 100pF, should there be 100pF only or should there be no external decoupling?

    Cheers

    Calum

  • Calum,

    Sorry for the lack of clarity; I'm saying  that based on my own intuition I do not believe there should be any requirement for external decoupling.

    If you've observed something to the contrary, though, I can certainly try to build something up to check it out. This part doesn't have an evaluation kit, though, and the characterization setups are long gone - so it may take a while to get something ready.