This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ADS1292R RA/LA Respiration

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS1292R, ADS1292
We are currently testing with the ADS1292R for both ECG and respiration, using the RA/LA without RL drive (Two-Terminal Measurement as per Figure 1 in the Ti document 'Respiration Rate Measurement Based on Impedance
Pneumography').
.
.
We've encountered an issue in which the respiration measurement can effectively invert, so we appear to measure a decrease in impedance as the chest cavity expands during inspiration. This change from inverted to non inverted measurement can occur during a single test or between tests. We understand (again from the above Ti doc) that this can occur when using a sine wave carrier and the phase shift is too large (>135 degrees), however we are using a square wave carrier (sine wave not possible on the ADS1292R). What conditions could cause signal inversion using a square wave carrier?
.
.
Similary, we suspect we may need to optimise the phase shift and frequency for our particular setup.  We are currently using internal modulation and demodulation at a phase angle of 112.5 deg and modulation frequency of 32khz as recommended in the ADS1292R datasheet. Is there a procedure to follow to find the optimal settings for our sensors?
.
.
See attached our current RESP/ECG front end.
Registry Settings:
reg_config1 = 0x02;  // continuous mode, sample at 500Hz
reg_config2 = 0xA0;  // internal ref, VREF 2.42V
reg_loff    = 0x11;  // AC lead off (actually unused)
reg_ch1set  = 0x00;  // normal, gain = 6
reg_ch2set  = 0x00;  // normal, gain = 6
reg_rld     = 0x00;  // no RLD
reg_loff_sens    = 0x00;  // all disabled
reg_resp1   = 0xEA;  // mod/demod on, 112.5 deg phase, all internal
reg_resp2   = 0x03;  // 32KHz resp control freq, internal RLDREF
  • Hi Robert,

    Welcome to the e2e forum!

    Your ADS1292 register settings seem fine, and your schematic looks good however a colleague of mine noticed that you are setting the common mode level very low. Are R29 and R30 really 1M ohm or are they the same 10M ohm that you have for R24 and R25? You might be clipping the bottom portion of the waveform giving you erroneous results. Can you try changing your CM voltage and let us know if that clears up the problem?
  • They are as on the schematic, we'll try changing and update as to the changes. Thanks.