• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 48 subscribers
  • Views 1873 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ADC12D1600: ADC12D1600 IBIS simulation in ADS

Thai Ho
Prodigy 40 points

Part Number: ADC12D1600
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADC12D800RF, , , ADC12D1620QML-SP

Hello,

I am just wondering if anyone has tried to simulate the IBIS model of this component in ADS.

Thank you

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 20541 points
    Hi Thai,

    We are looking at your question and will get back to you soon.

    Regards,
    Neeraj
  • 0 in reply to Neeraj Gill
    TI__Mastermind 44680 points
    Hi Thai
    I am checking to see if we have any ADS simulations using the model. So far I haven't found any but will do some more checking on Monday.
    Are you trying to model a specific interface on the ADC?
    Have you run into problems trying to do the simulations?
    If you can provide any specific details that would be helpful.
    Best regards,
    Jim B
  • 0 in reply to Jim Brinkhurst1
    Prodigy 40 points

    Hi Jim,

    At the moment, I am looking at a very standard/typical interface just to test performance parameters of this component at high Nyquist zones and also multiple component in time-interleave. I don't have yet a working ADS using IBIS model of this component as I don't know how to configure it in ADS. Thank you.

    Regards

  • 0 in reply to Thai Ho
    TI__Mastermind 44680 points
    Hi Thai
    Can you provide the version of ADS that you are using?
    Thanks,
    Jim B
  • 0 in reply to Jim Brinkhurst1
    TI__Mastermind 44680 points
    Hello Thai
    Also please note the purpose of the IBIS model is to allow validation of the clock and data interfaces of this device with clock generators and data receivers.
    It will not be useful to determine the dynamic performance of the ADC with specific input signals and sample rates. For that type of evaluation you should use the ADC12D1600RB evaluation board and perform lab measurements.
    Best regards,
    Jim B
  • 0 in reply to Jim Brinkhurst1
    Prodigy 40 points

    Hello Jim,

    I am using ADS 2017. Thank you.

  • 0 in reply to Jim Brinkhurst1
    Prodigy 40 points
    Hi Jim,
    is it true that this component has exactly the same signal performance compared to the component ADC12D1600QML? Thank you
  • 0 in reply to Thai Ho
    TI__Mastermind 44680 points

    Hello Thai

    The closest devices in feature set and functionality to the ADC12D1600QML-SP are the ADC12D1620QML-SP, ADC12D1600RF (similar to non-LSPSM mode in ADC12D16x0QML-SP) and ADC12D800RF (similar to LSPSM mode in ADC12D16x0QML-SP). 

    The ADC12D1600QML-SP and ADC12D1620QML-SP are space rated devices and are packaged in a ceramic column grid array package. The same IC die is used in both devices, but the ADC12D1620QML-SP has an improved package substrate design (connects the IC die to the package columns) to improve crosstalk and dynamic performance.

    The ADC12D1600RF and ADC12D800RF use a thermally enhanced plastic BGA package.

    Package parasitic differences between the various packages do result in differences in performance. Please refer to the product datasheets for each device to get a better understanding of those differences.

    Best regards,

    Jim B

  • 0 in reply to Jim Brinkhurst1
    TI__Mastermind 44680 points
    Hello Thai
    I have requested an example ADS model for the ADC12D1600QML-SP CLK input, DI0 data and DCLKI output interfaces.
    Due to the modeling team workload it will take 1-2 weeks for the model to be prepared. I expect I should have something to share with you around March 8.
    Best regards,
    Jim B