We have received a question about the minimum and maximum values of tDRPW of ADS1672 from one of our customer.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
We have received a question about the minimum and maximum values of tDRPW of ADS1672 from one of our customer.
Hi Tom and Ryan,
Thank you very much for your reply.
The following is the customer's setup.
●Configuration
・SCLK_SEL=1 :Pull-up to 3.3V
・DATA RATE[1:0]=11 : Pull-up to 3.3V
・LL_CONFIG=1 :Pull-up to 3.3V
・FPATH=0 :Connected to GND
SCLK is about 240 ns with the same frequency as CLK.
The START pin is controlled from the FPGA,It is fixed from the low to High after turning on the power supply.
The Oscilloscope waveform is attached.
ADS1672_Waveform_GOOD_181031.pdf
ADS1672_START signal rising waveform_181029.pdf
I would like to isolate the cause of whether the short pulse width of DRDY is due to device failure or normal width.
Best regards,
Morita
Hi Tom,
Thank you very much for considering this question.
This issue is effecting our customer's production schedule, so we appreciate your quick response.
And I am sorry for the incomplete details.
The "Bad" in the original post is about DRDY pulse width.
"Leads to error" means the erroneous reading at FPGA. Because of the short DRDY pulse the
FPGA is not able to recognize the DRDY pulse and hence the error.
We would like to know if this kind of behavior is a possible scenario with ADS1672's use cases?
And what could be the possible reasons.
Best Regards
Morita
Hi Tom, Ryan
Any suggestion on this issue.
This issue needs to be closed immediately as the production line will be stopped until there is a conclusion.
Could you please let us know if you have any comments on the above question.
Best Regards
Morita
Hi Morita,
In the PDF plots you sent for 'ADS1672_Waveform_GOOD' and the 'ADS1672_Start' signal, I suspect that there was bandwidth limiting enabled on the scope (I don't understand why you are blanking out portions of the display). In the original in-line plots, I suspect BW limiting was turned off. Can you also provide us with a plot similar to the 'GOOD' but showing the 'BAD' behavior? You seem to be running with a relatively slow tCLK, but that should not be causing this sort of problem. There may be noise getting into the START signal or perhaps the SCLK/TCLK causing problems as well. What is the status of /CS and the other control pins?
Hello Morita-san,
'ADS1672_Waveform_GOOD' clearly shows sufficient delay between /DRDY and the first SCLK rising edge, as well as sufficient delay between the last SCLK falling edge and the next /DRDY. Can you please share the same scope capture for the 'Bad' response with CLK, SCLK, /DRDY, and START? We need to see if the device is completing a conversion during an SPI read.
Best Regards,
Hello Ryan,
I have not got the same scope capture at 'Bad' response yet.
I will keep you updated.
What is the reason why the pulse width of DRDY changes under the same conditions?
Which signal or clock affects the pulse width of DRDY?
Best regards,
Morita