Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADC3443
Hello,
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
Hi XL,
The ADC3444 will be able to sample all of the IF signals that you have listed.If you sample at 80 MSPS, the 45 MHz IF will "fold" back to 35 MHz since it would be in 2nd Nyquist zone, so I think that will probably be ok in terms of frequency planning.
Best Regards,
Dan
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your help.
I'm wondering if I would have problems when I use 45MHz intermediate freuqnecy. My question is, if I use 45MHz, the signal will fold into the 1st Nyquist zone, but I could do overs-ampling any more because 35MHz x 2 = 70MHz < 80MHz, just twice the Nyquist rate. This respect theory of Shannon but it will not improve the resolution and the SNR compared to oversampling (N for oversampling factor, thus SNR increased by sqrt (N)). Do I need to reduce the IF frequency to improve the performance ? Am I wrong or I'm missing something ?
Thanks in advances,
Best regards,
XL
Hi XL,
I believe you are correct, but, as the input frequency increases, the SNR degradation will be dominated by the phase noise/jitter of the sampling clock and aperture jitter of the ADC. If you look at the difference in performance between 10 MHz and 70 MHz, there is only about 0.1 dB difference in SNR
Also, if you look at the ADC3443 AC performance specifications (80 MSPS), it also has a difference of about 0.1 dB between 10 MHz and 70 MHz.
My suggestion is that you do not need to modify these frequencies if you are concerned with performance.
Best Regards,
Dan