This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ADS1278-HT: Offset/Gain Warmup Drift Response

Part Number: ADS1278-HT

Hello Guys,

Good day.

Our customer is using the ADS1278-HT for downhole drilling application. In their application they need to perform some highly precise measurements "as soon as possible" after the device startup.  On page 26 within the datasheet there is a figure called "Offset Warmup Drift Response band" and " Gain Warmup drift response band." What is causing these drifts and if those drifts became "worst" over temperature?

They need a signal accuracy of around 20µV "as soon as possible" after startup of the device. But they see a large time constant within their data that correlates to those diagrams. What is the normalized Offset in (µV) normalized to? Same question for the Gain ? what causes these drifts? Can they influence this by a certain startup method ?

Note that the converter runs in Low-Power mode at Master-Clock of 102.4kHz and the output datarate is 200Hz.

Thanks and regards,

Art

  • Hello Art,

    The drift is due to self heating of the die when the part is first powered up.  In Low-power mode, the device dissipates 245mW at room temperature, and at elevated temperatures closer to the max 210C spec, it can be as high as 455mW.  Since the customer is running at a very low data rate, I suggest they use the Low-speed mode, which is actually much lower power than Low-power mode, 50mW typical and 120mW max.  The maximum shift in specs during warm-up is much less, as shown in figures 29 and 30.

    These figures are relative to the offset and gain error drifts in the datasheet.  For example, if the customer performs gain and offset calibration, then the effective gain and offset error will be near 0.  The figures then show how long it takes to get to 0 error for a calibrated ADC after power-up.

    Regards,
    Keith Nicholas
    Precision ADC Applications

  • Thanks for looking into this Keith.

    The customer will try to run the ADC in low speed mode. If this helps they might do a redesign.

    Unfortunately they have several design that run in the low power mode already in field and the mode is “HW-jumperd” means without an option to change this over a Firmware fix in the µC interfacing the ADC.

    Below are the follow-up inquiries from the customer:

    1) The customer wants to know how this effect scales up with respect to temperature? Is there a curve over temperature on how the offset and gain drifts during start-up?

    2) The customer understand it the way that the normalized drift value at lower temperature in low power mode is approx. 245mW (at 102,4kHz ? ) and 455mW at higher temperatures results in factor of approx. 1,8 power dissipation increment. Does the offset and gain error also scale up with this ratio?

    3) In their system, they don’t have an explicit "ADC-calibration" they perform a system calibration including sensors as well as the ADC-Frontend, SMPS, ADC etc. while everything is fully settled. The calibration is done from Room temperature up to 175°C. Each temperature step will be settled for around 30min, after this time all sub-circuits are "settled". Therefore this calibration is not valid during start-up because of non-stationary offsets and gains.

    One measurement requirement is to provide a precise measurement quite fast after start-up approx. 3seconds later. This ADC does not have a self-calibration function. Can you provide a calibration table from room temperature up to 175°C for the device? That theycan implement within the µC prior to their temperature calibration? Are these drifts “equal” for all 8 channels?

    4) Is there another solution like increasing the clock frequency to higher rates to increase the die “quicker” temperature during short times and then switching back to target clock frequency?

    Thanks and regards,
    Art
  • Hi Art,

    1)  I do not think we have warm-up drift at elevated temperatures, but it will be higher due to higher power dissipation in the device.  The warm-up drift is due to self heating creating temperature gradients across the die.  

    2)  I will need to follow-up on this question.  If the data was taken at room temperature, then the errors will likely be higher at elevated temperature due to higher power dissipation in the device.

    3)  Each device will have different warm-up drift over time, due to differences from part to part.  There will be differences between the 8 channels as well, but these should be much less than part to part errors. Each device would need calibrated after a few seconds at the target temperature, similar to the 'fully settled' calibration that is now done to significantly reduce the initial error.

    4)  Increasing the power dissipation by increasing clock frequency will only make the temperature gradients larger.  This will likely increase the warm-up time, not reduce it.

    The only approach I can think of would be to implement a correction based on the typical data in the datasheet, or, typical data that the customer has measured at elevated temperature.  This may reduce the initial error across several devices enough to meet the overall system accuracy targets.

    Please give me a few days to research this and provide an update.  You can expect a response by end of business on Wednesday of this week.

    Thanks,
    Keith

  • Thanks for looking into this Keith!

    -Art

  • Hi Art,

    The warm-up drift data was only collected at room temperature.  You can expect it to be greater at elevated temperature due to higher power dissipation.  We only looked at a few typical devices, and see a wide spread between channels and parts, +/-5uV to +/-20uV initial offset error in the high speed mode is typical.

    Based on this additional data, a calibration scheme using a single unit applied to multiple devices in the field will not likely help reduce the warm-up error.  A warm-up calibration would need to be done on a per-unit and per-channel basis to effectively reduce the warm-up drift.

    Regards,
    Keith