Why in BootROM_c6678_PG2.0 (processors.wiki.ti.com/.../Keystone_Device_Architecture) all sourse about c64x. It's right? Not quite clear. Or I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Leon.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Why in BootROM_c6678_PG2.0 (processors.wiki.ti.com/.../Keystone_Device_Architecture) all sourse about c64x. It's right? Not quite clear. Or I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Leon.
Hi, Raja.
If I understood you correctly I can use 6678 BootLoader PG2 for my c6678 board and it is checked and approved by TI,
despite the fact that everything is based on c64x.
Why, I ask? I tried the simple example and it's not working.
Thanks ,
Leon.